The Corporate Political Strategies in Transition Economy:A Comparison between SOEs and POEs

Jiang Shisong,Gong Limin,Wei Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.03.006
2011-01-01
Abstract:It is very critical for a firm to consider political strategy as a part of its overall strategy in order to build competitive advantage,especially in the context of transition economy.Applying Oliver and Holzinger’s(2008) analytical framework on political strategies,This article illustrates a political strategies pattern of SOEs and POEs and explores the mechanisms through which SOEs and POEs choose these strategies,by integrating institution-based view and resource-based view(especially dynamic capabilities view) of business strategy.Moreover,the contingence effect of size and institutional transition is documented,and a set of propositions are developed.Specifically,1) larger SOEs are more likely to choose proactive strategy and less likely to choose defensive strategy,while larger POEs are more likely to choose proactive and anticipatory strategy and less likely to choose reactive strategy,2) the SOEs,which operate in an institutional environment characterized by more market orientation,are more likely to choose reactive and defensive strategy and less likely to choose proactive strategy,in contrast,the POEs,which operate in an institutional environment characterized by more market orientation,are more likely to choose anticipatory strategy and less likely to choose reactive strategy.This study pres-ents a first attempt to build a model of political strategy choice for SOEs and POEs.By exploring the uniqueness of corporate political strategy choice in the context of transition economy,we not only ex-tend the domain of institution-based view of business strategy,but more importantly,address an understudied issue of this institution-based view,namely,how a firm adapts to institutional change and regulation shift.Regarding policy implications,in this case,firm size and institutional transition have both offsetting and enforcing effect on SOEs and POEs’ strategy choice.Therefore,policy makers need to bear in mind changes at firm as well as policy level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?