Abstract:Abstract: The effects of asymmetric information are often difficult to detect empirically, such as in insurance settings (Chiappori, Jullien, Salanie and Salanie, 2006). We show that allowing for the possibility of referencedependent preferences can assist with this challenge. Using detailed auto insurance claims data and adopting the methodology of Allen, DeChow, Pope and Wu (2017) which studies reference-dependence in marathon finishing times, we show that policyholders exaggerate their damage claims in a manner consistent with referencedependent moral hazard. Consistent with our theoretical model of reference-dependent claims, we find stronger reference-dependent behavior among policyholders with higher premium levels and low risk policyholders. Also consistent with the model, policyholders are more reference-dependent in their first claims than in subsequent claims, and in the second half of the coverage year compared to the first half. The detected reference point is the amount of the original premium paid in other words, in claiming their accident damages, policyholders seek to claim back the original price of their insurance. We do not find robust patterns in the concentration of insurance claims at round number percentages greater than or less than the full premium amount, such as 90% or 110%, nor at round number nominal amounts. This implies that the unnatural claim behavior is motivated significantly by loss aversion regarding the premium paid rather than merely wanting to increase one’s claims more generally. Since damage claims can only be this precisely manipulated by the policy holder after an accident, the findings can be attributed primarily to ex-post moral hazard but not adverse selection or ex-ante moral hazard. Furthermore, the pattern exists only for individually-held policies but not corporate-held policies, which is consistent with a reference point in individual utility. Our study illustrates the potential of behavioral economics frameworks in assisting with identification challenges for classical economic problems.

False Advertising

Truth, Lies and Advertising: Understanding Market and Individual Causes of False Advertising Claims

Tackling false advertising and strengthening consumer protection in emerging economies

Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie?

Antidumping duties and price undertakings: A welfare analysis

False Narratives and Political Mobilization

The Real Deal: Return Policies against Review Manipulation

Exaggerating to Break-Even: Reference-Dependent Moral Hazard in Auto Insurance Claims

Flexible Demand Manipulation

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

The economic impacts of social activism and corporate social responsibility on food fraud

Better is Better? Signaling Paradoxes in Performance-Based Advertising

Voluntary Disclosure and Personalized Pricing

Make it 'til you fake it

Influencer Cartels

Advertising Puffery: The Impact of Using Two-Sided Claims on Product Attitude and Purchase Intention

“You Will:” A Macroeconomic Analysis of Digital Advertising

A Theoretical Model of False Information Control

Style Over Substance? Advertising, Innovation, and Endogenous Market Structure

Naive analytics equilibrium

Interference Produces False-Positive Pricing Experiments