Abstract:Abstract Purpose Life cycle assessment (LCA) literature evaluating environmental burdens from lithium-ion battery (LIB) production facilities lacks an understanding of how environmental burdens have changed over time due to a transition to large-scale production. The purpose of this study is hence to examine the effect of upscaling LIB production using unique life cycle inventory data representative of large-scale production. A sub-goal of the study is to examine how changes in background datasets affect environmental impacts. Method We remodel an often-cited study on small-scale battery production by Ellingsen et al. (2014), representative of operations in 2010, and couple it to updated Ecoinvent background data. Additionally, we use new inventory data to model LIB cell production in a large-scale facility representative of the latest technology in LIB production. The cell manufactured in the small-scale facility is an NMC-1:1:1 (nickel-manganese-cobalt) pouch cell, whereas in the large-scale facility, the cell produced in an NMC-8:1:1 cylindrical cell. We model production in varying carbon intensity scenarios using recycled and exclusively primary materials as input options. We assess environmental pollution–related impacts using ReCiPe midpoint indicators and resource use impacts using the surplus ore method (ReCiPe) and the crustal scarcity indicator. Results and discussion Remodelling of the small-scale factory using updated background data showed a 34% increase in greenhouse gas emissions — linked to updated cobalt sulfate production data. Upscaling production reduced emissions by nearly 45% in the reference scenario (South Korean energy mix) due to a reduced energy demand in cell production. However, the emissions reduce by a further 55% if the energy is sourced from a low-carbon intensity source (Swedish energy mix), shifting almost all burden to upstream supply chain. Regional pollution impacts such as acidification and eutrophication show similar trends. Toxic emissions also reduce, but unlike other impacts, they were already occurring during mining and ore processing. Lastly, nickel, cobalt, and lithium use contribute considerably to resource impacts. From a long-term perspective, copper becomes important from a resource scarcity perspective. Conclusions Upscaling LIB production shifts environmental burdens to upstream material extraction and production, irrespective of the carbon intensity of the energy source. Thus, a key message for the industry and policy makers is that further reductions in the climate impacts from LIB production are possible, only when the upstream LIB supply chain uses renewable energy source. An additional message to LCA practitioners is to examine the effect of changing background systems when evaluating maturing technologies.

Quantifying the life-cycle health impacts of a cobalt-containing lithium-ion battery

The Cobalt Supply Chain and Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems

Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium-ion battery production

Social life cycle assessment of lithium iron phosphate battery production in China, Japan and South Korea based on external supply materials

Should high‐cobalt EV batteries be repurposed? Using LCA to assess the impact of technological innovation on the waste hierarchy

Comparison of three typical lithium-ion batteries for pure electric vehicles from the perspective of life cycle assessment

Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-ion Batteries: A Critical Review

Investigating greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts from the production of lithium-ion batteries in China

A Comparative Techno‐Economic and Lifecycle Analysis of Biomass‐Derived Anode Materials for Lithium‐ and Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Comparative life cycle assessment of LFP and NCM batteries including the secondary use and different recycling technologies

Dynamic material flow analysis of critical metals for lithium-ion battery system in China from 2000–2018

Potentials and hotspots of post-lithium-ion batteries: Environmental impacts and supply risks for sodium- and potassium-ion batteries

A social life cycle assessment of vanadium redox flow and lithium‐ion batteries for energy storage

Co-products recovery does not necessarily mitigate environmental and economic tradeoffs in lithium-ion battery recycling

Comparative life cycle analysis of critical materials recovery from spent Li-ion batteries

Life‐Cycle Assessment Considerations for Batteries and Battery Materials

Recycling and environmental issues of lithium-ion batteries: Advances, challenges and opportunities

Life Cycle Modelling of Extraction and Processing of Battery Minerals—A Parametric Approach

A raw material criticality and environmental impact assessment of state-of-the-art and post-lithium-ion cathode technologies

Potential environmental and human health menace of spent graphite in lithium-ion batteries

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mobile Power Banks with Lithium-Ion Battery and Lithium-Ion Polymer Battery