Comparison of three typical lithium-ion batteries for pure electric vehicles from the perspective of life cycle assessment

Tingting Jiang,Huifang Wang,Qiang Jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02629-6
IF: 4.3
2023-11-14
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Abstract:In the previous study, environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have become a concern due the large-scale production and application. The present paper aims to quantify the potential environmental impacts of LIBs in terms of life cycle assessment. Three different batteries are compared in this study: lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) 811 batteries and NCM622 batteries. The results show that the environmental impacts caused by LIBs are mainly reflected in five aspects from eleven evaluation indexes: Abiotic depletion (fossil fuels), Global warming, Human toxicity potential (HTP), Freshwater ecotoxicity potential (FETP) and Marine ecotoxicity potential (METP). The production phase and assembly phase of LIBs are the main sources of Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, the GHG emissions of NCM622 battery is 156.73 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh, which accounts for 35.40% of the total GHG emissions. The study shows that the hydrometallurgy method in the recycling phase may not always be environmentally friendly for NCM batteries, it can increase the indicators of HTP, FETP and METP. The precursor materials in NCM batteries and the electricity consumption of LFP batteries are sensitive factors to environmental impacts, which can be effectively improved by improving the process and optimizing the electricity mixes. Suggestions for process optimization of China's LIBs industry are proposed based on the future electricity mixes.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?