A raw material criticality and environmental impact assessment of state-of-the-art and post-lithium-ion cathode technologies

Marc Wentker,Matthew Greenwood,Marius Chofor Asaba,Jens Leker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101022
IF: 9.4
2019-12-01
Journal of Energy Storage
Abstract:<p>Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and alternative systems, often called post-lithium-ion batteries (PLIBs), appear poised to revolutionize the world's energy infrastructure. Within this paper, we examine LIB and PLIB cathode active materials (CAMs) on metrics of supply risk and environmental impact. We collect data related to each metric through sources including the USGS, European Commission, and LCA databases, transforming them into "risk indicators" with a uniform scale. We then compile these indicators to allow for analysis of each for both technologies and component metals. We examine historic trends and current data, additionally utilizing simulations in order to predict possible future development. We also utilize the CellEst cost model in order to provide analysis of cost and performance alongside supply risk and environmental impact, allowing for a comprehensive view of examined technologies. Several key findings include: cobalt and lithium not only have high supply risk, their supply risk is increasing; nickel, while having a lower supply risk than cobalt, has a higher environmental impact; and PLIB technologies generally have lower supply risk and, at least before cell processing, environmental impact than LIB technologies.</p>
energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?