Social life cycle assessment of lithium iron phosphate battery production in China, Japan and South Korea based on external supply materials

Yi Shi,Xintong Chen,Tingting Jiang,Qiang Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.021

IF: 8.921

2022-12-07

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Abstract:Recently, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries have been manifesting unique advantages and great potential for environmental sustainability in the transportation sector. In this context, there is an urgent need to assess equally non-negligible social risks such as "Labor Rights & Decent Work", "Health & Safety" and "Human Rights" incurred by LFP battery production. By introducing trade data, this study combined supply concentration and social life cycle assessment (SLCA) to explore the social risk profile of LFP battery production by referring to external supply data and the Social Hotspots Database (SHDB). Herein, the authors visualized the 2020–2021 related supply faced by China, Japan and South Korea by connecting materials with specific sources. Two SLCA schemes based on the single dominant supply source and multiple supply sources were demonstrated separately and compared with each other. The results and findings of this study can be briefly summarized as follows: 1) a supply concentration fact was found that two-thirds of the total trade supply of many materials of LFP batteries came from one source, for any one of China, Japan and South Korea; 2) social footprints within this study revealed that social risk of unit USD value materials from developed countries or developed regions is typically lower, between 1 and 5mrheq, while that of unit USD value materials from developing countries is typically lower, above 5mrheq; 3) SLCA based on weights of multiple sources has a corrective effect on SLCA based on the single dominant supply in the identification of key processes, materials and risk categories. For example, weighted SLCA made LFP replace the diaphragm to become the material with the highest risk in the Chinese LFP production scenario, and changed the social risk ranking of categories of "Health & Safety" and "Human Rights" in the Japanese scenario. The conclusions provide a core concern for the eager public discussion of LFP battery corporate social compliance, whereby LFP battery producers take more effective measures to optimize the social risk performance of materials and improve social standards in their global value chains in line with sustainability requirements.

environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology