Abstract:Given the changing nature of literacy, there is an urgent need to develop alternative ways of assessment in support of students' new literacy practices in the digital age. While emergent models of multimodal assessment are being developed in theoretical contexts, the study reported in this paper illustrates how multimodal theories can be realized in classroom practice. Seeking to address the needs of both literacy instruction and assessment, this study proposed a design rubric from the multiliteracies perspective to assess students' design of multimodal texts as a means to support assessable new literacy practices. Specifically, this research aimed to investigate how the design rubric as a formative assessment tool affects English learners' multimodal text production (in this case, presentation slides). The empirical results of this study reveal that the theory‐driven design rubric was useful for enhancing the students' understanding and awareness of the multimodal nature of presentation slides and led to improvement in their multimodal text production. The findings have important implications for scaffolding students' multimodal literacy by using formative assessment as one of the instructional approaches in multiliteracies pedagogy. What is already known about this topic The advent of digital technology brings about a re‐conceptualization of literacy. Today's students must be literate in both traditional printed texts and multimodal texts that are commonly associated with digital technology and multimedia. New literacy practices require teachers to develop new assessment practices. What this paper adds This paper offers valuable insights into literacy instruction and assessment. This paper presents a course design using action research that responds to the urgent need to develop alternative ways of assessment in support of students' new literacy practices in the digital age. This paper proposes a theory‐driven design rubric from the multiliteracies perspective to assess learners' multimodal text production. Implications for practice and/or policy Multimodal assessment allows teachers to help students build a metalanguage for understanding and describing multimodal texts. Literacy and language educators may consider adapting the proposed design rubric as a formative assessment tool to provide students with constructive feedback pertaining to the multimodality of texts. The proposed design rubric can also be used for peer review and self‐assessment.

Writing assessment for communities of writers: rubric validation to support formative assessment of writing in Pre-K to grade 2

Rubrics and formative assessment in K-12 education: A scoping review of literature

Writing Assessment Strategies by Junior High School English Teacher

Formative writing assessment for change – introduction to the special issue

Creating Formative Assessment Systems in the Teaching of Writing, and Harnessing Them as Professional Development

Assessing Students’ Use of Evidence and Organization in Response-to-Text Writing: Using Natural Language Processing for Rubric-Based Automated Scoring

Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric

Development and Assessment of a Rubric for Evaluating Teaching Portfolios Developed by Teaching and Learning Curriculum (TLC) Program Participants

Development and Validation of a Scoring Rubric for Editorial Evaluation of Peer-review Quality: A Pilot Study

Assessment as learning: examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom

Proceed with Caution: Interactive Rules and Teacher Work Sample Scoring Strategies, an Ethnomethodological Study

The affectability of writing assessment scores: a G-theory analysis of rater, task, and scoring method contribution

Lecturers’ perceptions: The value of assessment rubrics for informing teaching practice and curriculum review and development

Preliminary Validation of a Clinical Reasoning Theory-Based Assessment Rubric: An e-Delphi Study

Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum: learner-differentiated effects on writing achievement

Meta-Analysis of Criterion Validity for Curriculum-Based Measurement in Written Language

Application of an Automated Essay Scoring engine to English writing assessment using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement

What accounts for integrated reading-to-write task scores?

Comparative approaches to the assessment of writing: Reliability and validity of benchmark rating and comparative judgement

Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies

shared understanding of good writing?