Analysis of major lipid classes and their fatty acids in a cestode parasite of domestic fowl, raillietina (Fuhrmannetta) echinobothrida

M. Mondal,D. Mukhopadhyay,D. Ghosh,C. Dey,K. Misra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-009-0015-3

2009-12-01

Proceedings of the Zoological Society

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

Joseph Rencic,Lambert W.T. Schuwirth,Larry D. Gruppen,Steven J. Durning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0051

2020-02-06

Diagnosis

Abstract:Abstract Developing valid assessment approaches to clinical reasoning performance has been challenging. Situated cognition theory posits that cognition (e.g. clinical reasoning) emerges from interactions between the clinician and situational (contextual) factors and recognizes an opportunity to gain deeper insights into clinical reasoning performance and its assessment through the study of these interactions. The authors apply situated cognition theory to develop a conceptual model to better understand the assessment of clinical reasoning. The model highlights how the interactions between six contextual factors, including assessee, patient, rater, and environment, assessment method, and task, can impact the outcomes of clinical reasoning performance assessment. Exploring the impact of these interactions can provide insights into the nature of clinical reasoning and its assessment. Three significant implications of this model are: (1) credible clinical reasoning performance assessment requires broad sampling of learners by expert raters in diverse workplace-based contexts; (2) contextual factors should be more explicitly defined and explored; and (3) non-linear statistical models are at times necessary to reveal the complex interactions that can impact clinical reasoning performance assessment.
Isolated hypomagnesaemia presenting as focal seizures in diabetes mellitus.

F. Matthey,C. Gelder,F. Schon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.293.6559.1409

1986-11-29

British Medical Journal

Abstract:Hypomagnesaemia is a well known association of diabetes mellitus; it is often asymptomatic but may manifest as tremor, tetany, delirium, hallucinations, or, when severe, generalised seizures. In such instances it is usually associated with hypocalcaemia. We report on a diabetic patient with severe hypomagnesaemia but normocalcaemia who developed focal seizures that proved refractory to conventional anticonvulsant treatment but were abolished when the serum magnesium concentration was corrected.
The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: a national validation study

Thamer Nouh,Marylise Boutros,Robert Gagnon,Susan Reid,Kenneth Leslie,David Pace,Dennis Pitt,Ross Walker,Daniel Schiller,Anthony MacLean,Morad Hameed,Paola Fata,Bernard Charlin,Sarkis H Meterissian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.006

Abstract:Introduction: The script concordance test (SCT) is an innovative tool for clinical reasoning assessment. It has previously been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of clinical reasoning among general surgical residents. Purpose: To determine if the SCT maintained its validity and reliability when administered on a national level. Methods: The test was administered to 202 residents (51 R1, 45 R2, 45 R3, 28 R4, and 33 R5) in 9 general surgery programs across Canada. Results: The optimized version of the test had a reliability (Cronbach alpha) of .85. Scores increased progressively from R1 (64.5 ± 7.6) to R2 (69.5 ± 5.8) to R3 (69.9 ± 6.7) to R4 (72.0 ± 6.2) with a dip in the R5s (68.3 ± 8.6). The test was able to differentiate junior (R1+ R2 = 66.8 ± 7.2) from senior residents (R3 + R4 + R5 = 70.0 ± 7.3, P = .001) across all the programs. Conclusions: The SCT maintained its reliability and validity as a measure of intraoperative clinical reasoning among general surgical residents when administered across multiple centers. We believe that the SCT can be developed to measure clinical reasoning in high-stakes national examinations.
An electron-deficient metallocavitand with an unusual selectivity towards substituted benzene derivatives during co-crystallizations.

Chang-cang Huang,Jian‐Jun Liu,Yong Chen,Meijin Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc46022c

IF: 4.9

2013-11-15

Chemical Communications

Abstract:A double-wall-hourglass-shaped metallocavitand bearing an electron-deficient cavity was self-assembled, which exhibited an unusual selectivity to substituted benzene derivatives of different electron density during co-crystallizations.
Distribution of inhibitory synapses on the somata of pyramidal neurons in cat motor cortex.

P. B. Cipolloni,L. Kimerer,N. Weintraub,D. Smith,A. Keller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08990229870691

Somatosensory & Motor Research

Abstract:The mechanisms by which cortical neurons perform spatial and temporal integration of synaptic inputs are dependent, in large part, on the numbers, types, and distributions of their synapses. To further our understanding of these integrative mechanisms, we examined the distribution of synapses on identified classes of cortical neurons. Pyramidal cells in the cat motor cortex projecting either to the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex or to the spinal cord were labeled by the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. Entire soma of selected corticocortical and corticospinal cells were examined using serial-section electron microscopy. The profiles of these somata and the synapses formed with each of these profiles were reconstructed from each thin section with a computer-aided morphometry system. All somatic synapses were of the symmetrical, presumably inhibitory type. For both cell types, these synapses were not homogeneously distributed over the somatic membrane, but were clustered at several discrete zones. The number and density of synapses on the somata of different corticocortical and corticospinal neurons were not significantly different. However, the density of these synapses was inversely correlated with the size of their postsynaptic somata. We discuss the significance of these findings to the integrative properties of cortical neurons.
Validity and reliability of Brier scoring for assessment of probabilistic diagnostic reasoning

Nathan Stehouwer,Anastasia Rowland-Seymour,Larry Gruppen,Jeffrey M Albert,Kelli Qua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0109

2024-10-16

Abstract:Objectives: Educators need tools for the assessment of clinical reasoning that reflect the ambiguity of real-world practice and measure learners' ability to determine diagnostic likelihood. In this study, the authors describe the use of the Brier score to assess and provide feedback on the quality of probabilistic diagnostic reasoning. Methods: The authors describe a novel format called Diagnostic Forecasting (DxF), in which participants read a brief clinical case and assign a probability to each item on a differential diagnosis, order tests and select a final diagnosis. DxF was piloted in a cohort of senior medical students. DxF evaluated students' answers with Brier scores, which compare probabilistic forecasts with case outcomes. The validity of Brier scores in DxF was assessed by comparison to subsequent decision-making in the game environment of DxF, as well as external criteria including medical knowledge tests and performance on clinical rotations. Results: Brier scores were statistically significantly correlated with diagnostic accuracy (95 % CI -4.4 to -0.44) and with mean scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) shelf exams (95 % CI -474.6 to -225.1). Brier scores did not correlate with clerkship grades or performance on a structured clinical skills exam. Reliability as measured by within-student correlation was low. Conclusions: Brier scoring showed evidence for validity as a measurement of medical knowledge and predictor of clinical decision-making. Further work must evaluated the ability of Brier scores to predict clinical and workplace-based outcomes, and develop reliable approaches to measuring probabilistic reasoning.
Current status and ongoing needs for the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning – an international mixed-methods study from the students` and teachers` perspective

F. L Wagner,M. Sudacka,A. A Kononowicz,M. Elvén,S. J Durning,I. Hege,S. Huwendiek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05518-8

IF: 3.263

2024-06-07

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:Clinical reasoning (CR) is a crucial ability that can prevent errors in patient care. Despite its important role, CR is often not taught explicitly and, even when it is taught, typically not all aspects of this ability are addressed in health professions education. Recent research has shown the need for explicit teaching of CR for both students and teachers. To further develop the teaching and learning of CR we need to improve the understanding of students' and teachers' needs regarding content as well as teaching and assessment methods for a student and trainer CR curriculum.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
Evaluating Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Value of a Virtual Oral Assessment

Michelle Jeffery,A Reema Kar,Archana Pradhan,Samantha Brannigan,Carol Terregino,Hanin Rashid,Rick Salisbury,Conrad Johnson,Sugeet Jagpal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241250049

Abstract:Background: Oral assessments are essential components of board certification in numerous fields, as they provide insight into problem-solving capacity and clinical reasoning. The development of clinical reasoning often begins in undergraduate medical education and remains a challenge to assess. Objective: We developed a pilot oral assessment to evaluate medical student oral presentations and systematically assess clinical reasoning. This was incorporated into a previously existing cumulative assessment at the conclusion of the third year of medical school, with the intent to demonstrate feasibility and future reliability of this exam format. Methods: This pilot oral assessment was developed using content taught during third year clerkships. A modified Assessment of Reasoning Tool (ART) was used as the evaluation metric. It was conducted virtually to include faculty members from multiple disciplines and accommodate schedules and space limitations. Results: A total of 152 third year medical students completed the exam, with a total of 15 faculty examiners. 89% of medical students scored as complete in hypothesis directed history, 93% in problem representation, 86% in prioritized differential diagnoses, and 67% in effectively directing management. Most examiners felt an oral assessment is effective to determine a medical student's clinical reasoning ability. Conclusions: Virtual oral assessments of clinical reasoning can be incorporated in undergraduate medical education to identify students struggling with components of clinical reasoning, while also allowing maximum flexibility for the clinician educator workforce as examiners. Longitudinal use of these exams would be valuable to track the development of clinical reasoning across the medical school curriculum.
Steps to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning in dermatology: A scoping review and proposal

Aliya Rodriguez,Christopher Farkouh,Rebecca Raszewski,Claudia Hernandez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.352

2024-03-04

Abstract:Clinical reasoning (CR) is an area of active interest since faults in the diagnostic process can result in errors and possibly delays in care or even patient harm. The purpose of this scoping review was to collect information from the medical literature on approaches utilized to teach and assess CR in dermatology, identify gaps, and prepare a proposal on how to enhance the speciality's ability to develop trainee CR skills. We conducted a review of the published literature (1990-2020) from four databases. The initial search yielded 780 papers, and 42 relevant CR publications met inclusion criteria. Demographic, thematic content, theoretical frameworks, continuum of authenticity, competency/milestone, and assessment/educational intervention data were recorded by two screeners. Trainees at different educational levels from 17 different countries have been assessed in the dermatology literature. Most publications were of a single intervention, appeared underpowered, and had small sample sizes. Only two publications examined work-based assessments (use real patients/stimuli). Knowledge-based studies were the dominant theoretical framework with no studies exclusively focused on process-based CR interventions. Simulation was well represented with 23 (55%) investigations. Rigorous studies that examine CR teaching and assessment in dermatology are lacking. Evidence-based best practices for use of work-based assessments, especially direct observation, need to be developed/adapted for dermatology and validated. Dermatology training programs would benefit from longitudinal data on trainee CR development, process-based CR educational programs, metacognition CR exploration specific to skin disease diagnosis, and studies that yield practical recommendations on how to structure multi-faceted assessments that assess CR.
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Clinical Reasoning Scale Among Nursing Students Enrolled in Three Types of Programs in Taiwan

Hui-Man HUANG,Chu-Yu HUANG,Kuan-Chia LIN,Chia-Hui YU,Su-Fen CHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000547

2023-03-31

The journal of nursing research : JNR

Abstract:Critical reasoning (CR) is a "complex cognitive process that uses formal and informal thinking strategies to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate the significance of this information and weigh alternative actions" ( Simmons, 2010 , p. 1155). CR is a required and essential nursing competency emphasized in nursing professional guidelines ( National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties, 2017 ), certification/licensure requirements ( National Council State Boards of Nursing, 2019 ), and educational standards ( American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN], 2021 ). Moreover, CR is a vital attribute that distinguishes professional nurses from ancillary care providers ( AACN, 2021 ; Simmons, 2010 ). Good CR in nurses has been associated with high-quality nursing care, patient well-being, and positive patient outcomes ( Jang et al., 2021 ; Kao et al., 2022 ; Manetti, 2018 ). The importance of CR in nurses is especially amplified in complex healthcare environments characterized by rapidly changing system/patient needs, high-stakes practice, technological innovation, and healthcare information explosions ( AACN, 2021 ; Kavanagh & Szweda, 2017 ; Kim et al., 2022 ).
The effect of antenatal dexamethasone administration on the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm gestations with premature rupture of membranes.

Morales Wj,N.Donald Diebel,Arnold J. Lazar,Deborah Zadrozny

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(86)90607-1

IF: 9.8

1986-03-01

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:
Increased magnesium intake prevents hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance and reduces lipid peroxidation in fructose-fed rats.

L. Olatunji,A. Soladoye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PATHOPHYS.2006.09.004

2007-05-31

Pathophysiology

Abstract:
Evaluating clinical reasoning in first year DPT students using a script concordance test

Lindsey Kojich,Stephanie A. Miller,Katelyn Axman,Timothy Eacret,J. Atticus Koontz,Caroline Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05281-w

IF: 3.263

2024-03-23

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:A script concordance test (SCT) provides a series of clinical vignettes to assess clinical reasoning in uncertainty. Appraised throughout health education literature, SCTs are cognitive assessments of clinical reasoning, though their use in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) entry-level education has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to develop and explore the reliability and validity of a SCT for first year DPT students.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
Proposal of a digital tool to develop clinical reasoning of novice nurses in psychiatry: An exploratory study in France

Yannick Guyennet,Mathilde Garry-Bruneau,Pierre Pennamen,Edouard Verrière,Catherine Maingard,Clémence Dallaire

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106117

IF: 3.906

2024-01-30

Nurse Education Today

Abstract:In France, successive reforms in nursing education have resulted in a 90 % reduction in hours of theoretical instruction in clinical psychopathology since 1972. As a result, novice nurses in psychiatry feel that they have not received sufficient theoretical training at the beginning of their careers. This particularly affects their ability to search for reliable data in order to guide and orient their clinical judgment. The objective of this exploratory study is to determine if a digital tool could serve as a lever to help these novice nurses in psychiatry to improve the various phases within clinical judgment. Similar digital tools have shown promising results in other medical fields but, to our knowledge, there are no reports of such a system for nursing psychiatry in the literature. A cross-sectional quotation qualitative study was carried out by interviewing seventeen novice nurses in psychiatry with different profiles. The interview guide, based on Benner's theory and Tanner and Rabardel's models, addresses several topics: professional background and motivation, evaluation of initial training, problems identified in practice, sources of information in the field of psychiatry, and finally acceptance of digital tools. The analysis of these interviews confirms the feeling of lack of knowledge among these professionals and indicates that a digital tool would be well accepted. Several examples were identified for the content of this tool, including ways to use it during the clinical judgment process.

nursing,education, scientific disciplines
Fetal Isolated Ventriculomegaly: Is There any Neonatal Consequences?

S. Vlădăreanu,V. Traistaru,R. Vlădăreanu,A. Kurjak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10009-1392

Abstract:Isolated fetal ventriculomegaly is the most common cerebral anomaly encountered in utero during a routine pregnancy scan. Ultrasonography remains the most easy to access tool in the examination of the fetal brain, although fetal MRI is a more accurate method of evaluating fetal ventriculomegaly— asso ciated brain anomalies are found in 17% of the cases after performing fetal MRI. Amniocentesis with chromosomal evaluation must be performed, because kariotype anomalies are more frequently encountered in fetuses with enlargement of the ventricular atrium, but the ventriculomegaly can be a cosequence of congenital infection with CMV, Toxoplasma or Rubella. Fetal isolated ventriculomegaly is a significant risk factor for developmental delay in children.
Assessing clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students during history taking with an empirically derived scale for clinical reasoning indicators

Sophie Fürstenberg,Tillmann Helm,Sarah Prediger,Martina Kadmon,Pascal O. Berberat,Sigrid Harendza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02260-9

IF: 3.263

2020-10-19

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:Abstract Background The clinical reasoning process, which requires biomedical knowledge, knowledge about problem-solving strategies, and knowledge about reasons for diagnostic procedures, is a key element of physicians’ daily practice but difficult to assess. The aim of this study was to empirically develop a Clinical Reasoning Indicators-History Taking-Scale (CRI-HT-S) and to assess the clinical reasoning ability of advanced medical students during a simulation involving history taking. Methods The Clinical Reasoning Indictors-History Taking-Scale (CRI-HT-S) including a 5-point Likert scale for assessment was designed from clinical reasoning indicators identified in a qualitative study in 2017. To assess indicators of clinical reasoning ability, 65 advanced medical students (semester 10, n = 25 versus final year, n = 40) from three medical schools participated in a 360-degree competence assessment in the role of beginning residents during a simulated first workday in hospital. This assessment included a consultation hour with five simulated patients which was videotaped. Videos of 325 patient consultations were assessed using the CRI-HT-S. A factor analysis was conducted and the students’ results were compared according to their advancement in undergraduate medical training. Results The clinical reasoning indicators of the CRI-HT-S loaded on three factors relevant for clinical reasoning: 1) focusing questions, 2) creating context, and 3) securing information. Students reached significantly different scores ( p < .001) for the three factors (factor 1: 4.07 ± .47, factor 2: 3.72 ± .43, factor 3: 2.79 ± .83). Students in semester 10 reached significantly lower scores for factor 3 than students in their final year ( p < .05). Conclusions The newly developed CRI-HT-S worked well for quantitative assessment of clinical reasoning indicators during history taking. Its three-factored structure helped to explore different aspects of clinical reasoning. Whether the CRI-HT-S has the potential to be used as a scale in objective structured clinical examinations (OCSEs) or in workplace-based assessments of clinical reasoning has to be investigated in further studies with larger student cohorts.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
A Clinical Reasoning Tool for Virtual Patients: Design-Based Research Study

Inga Hege,Andrzej A Kononowicz,Martin Adler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.8100

2017-11-02

JMIR Medical Education

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Clinical reasoning is a fundamental process medical students have to learn during and after medical school. Virtual patients (VP) are a technology-enhanced learning method to teach clinical reasoning. However, VP systems do not exploit their full potential concerning the clinical reasoning process; for example, most systems focus on the outcome and less on the process of clinical reasoning.OBJECTIVES: Keeping our concept grounded in a former qualitative study, we aimed to design and implement a tool to enhance VPs with activities and feedback, which specifically foster the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills.METHODS: We designed the tool by translating elements of a conceptual clinical reasoning learning framework into software requirements. The resulting clinical reasoning tool enables learners to build their patient's illness script as a concept map when they are working on a VP scenario. The student's map is compared with the experts' reasoning at each stage of the VP, which is technically enabled by using Medical Subject Headings, which is a comprehensive controlled vocabulary published by the US National Library of Medicine. The tool is implemented using Web technologies, has an open architecture that enables its integration into various systems through an open application program interface, and is available under a Massachusetts Institute of Technology license.RESULTS: We conducted usability tests following a think-aloud protocol and a pilot field study with maps created by 64 medical students. The results show that learners interact with the tool but create less nodes and connections in the concept map than an expert. Further research and usability tests are required to analyze the reasons.CONCLUSIONS: The presented tool is a versatile, systematically developed software component that specifically supports the clinical reasoning skills acquisition. It can be plugged into VP systems or used as stand-alone software in other teaching scenarios. The modular design allows an extension with new feedback mechanisms and learning analytics algorithms.
Script Concordance and the Think-Aloud Approach Through the Lens of Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory

Mary Tedesco-Schneck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001008

Abstract:Background: Script concordance (SC) and the think-aloud (TA) approach informed by cognitive apprenticeship theory can promote clinical reasoning. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether SC with the TA approach based on the tenets of cognitive apprenticeship theory facilitated clinical reasoning in senior-level prelicensure nursing students in a baccalaureate program. Methods: This study was executed in a didactic pediatric nursing course using a quantitative, nonexperimental design. Creation of the SC/TA learning activity was grounded in cognitive apprenticeship theory and based on the SC testing/TA testing method. Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a difference (P = .001 and .003) between earlier and later SC scores for the fall 2018 cohort. Conclusion: The SC/TA teaching/learning activity informed by cognitive apprenticeship theory offers a leveled approach to foster clinical reasoning in prelicensure nursing education.
Evaluation of the reliability of diagnostic thinking inventory for physical therapist and of the development of clinical reasoning in physiotherapy students

Fagner Luiz Pacheco Salles,Denise Maciel Ferreira,Francielen Fonseca Lima,Pedro Henriques Orides da Silva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2020.1842494

2020-11-10

European Journal of Physiotherapy

Abstract:Several instruments have been developed to assess clinical reasoning ability, regardless of specific knowledge. One of these instruments is the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI), used by doctors and medical students to determine their level of diagnostic clinical reasoning as it applies to the diagnosis. The purposes of the pilot study were three-fold: (1) to assess internal consistency after adapting the DTI to the context of physical therapy (DTI-PT), (2) to assess the association between diagnostic clinical reasoning, self-assessment of clinical reasoning ability, and academic performance among physiotherapy students; and (3) to compare diagnostic clinical reasoning, self-assessment of clinical reasoning ability, and academic performance in the beginning and the end of the semester. A total of 40 physiotherapy students were assessed for the association of student performance, student clinical competence and DTI-PT between the beginning of August and the end of November 2017 in the discipline of assessment in physiotherapy. The results showed an improvement in the DTI-PT score and its sub-scales at the end of the semester. There was an improvement in the student clinical competence and in the students' performance score. DTI-PT can be an effective tool to determine the clinical reasoning of physiotherapy students.
Using an experiential learning model to teach clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias: an evaluation of a first-year medical student curriculum

Justin J Choi,Jeanie Gribben,Myriam Lin,Erika L Abramson,Juliet Aizer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2153782

Abstract:Background: Most medical students entering clerkships have limited understanding of clinical reasoning concepts. The value of teaching theories of clinical reasoning and cognitive biases to first-year medical students is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the value of explicitly teaching clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias to first-year medical students. Methods: Using Kolb's experiential learning model, we introduced dual process theory, script theory, and cognitive biases in teaching clinical reasoning to first-year medical students at an academic medical center in New York City between January and June 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, instruction was transitioned to a distance learning format in March 2020. The curriculum included a series of written clinical reasoning examinations with facilitated small group discussions. Written self-assessments prompted each student to reflect on the experience, draw conclusions about their clinical reasoning, and plan for future encounters involving clinical reasoning. We evaluated the value of the curriculum using mixed-methods to analyze faculty assessments, student self-assessment questionnaires, and an end-of-curriculum anonymous questionnaire eliciting student feedback. Results: Among 318 total examinations of 106 students, 254 (80%) had a complete problem representation, while 199 (63%) of problem representations were considered concise. The most common cognitive biases described by students in their clinical reasoning were anchoring bias, availability bias, and premature closure. Four major themes emerged as valuable outcomes of the CREs as identified by students: (1) synthesis of medical knowledge; (2) enhanced ability to generate differential diagnoses; (3) development of self-efficacy related to clinical reasoning; (4) raised awareness of personal cognitive biases. Conclusions: We found that explicitly teaching clinical reasoning theory and cognitive biases using an experiential learning model provides first-year medical students with valuable opportunities for developing knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy related to clinical reasoning.

Analysis of major lipid classes and their fatty acids in a cestode parasite of domestic fowl, raillietina (Fuhrmannetta) echinobothrida

Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

Isolated hypomagnesaemia presenting as focal seizures in diabetes mellitus.

The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: a national validation study

An electron-deficient metallocavitand with an unusual selectivity towards substituted benzene derivatives during co-crystallizations.

Distribution of inhibitory synapses on the somata of pyramidal neurons in cat motor cortex.

Validity and reliability of Brier scoring for assessment of probabilistic diagnostic reasoning

Current status and ongoing needs for the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning – an international mixed-methods study from the students` and teachers` perspective

Evaluating Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Value of a Virtual Oral Assessment

Steps to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning in dermatology: A scoping review and proposal

Development and Psychometric Testing of the Clinical Reasoning Scale Among Nursing Students Enrolled in Three Types of Programs in Taiwan

The effect of antenatal dexamethasone administration on the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm gestations with premature rupture of membranes.

Increased magnesium intake prevents hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance and reduces lipid peroxidation in fructose-fed rats.

Evaluating clinical reasoning in first year DPT students using a script concordance test

Proposal of a digital tool to develop clinical reasoning of novice nurses in psychiatry: An exploratory study in France

Fetal Isolated Ventriculomegaly: Is There any Neonatal Consequences?

Assessing clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students during history taking with an empirically derived scale for clinical reasoning indicators

A Clinical Reasoning Tool for Virtual Patients: Design-Based Research Study

Script Concordance and the Think-Aloud Approach Through the Lens of Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory

Evaluation of the reliability of diagnostic thinking inventory for physical therapist and of the development of clinical reasoning in physiotherapy students

Using an experiential learning model to teach clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias: an evaluation of a first-year medical student curriculum