Increased magnesium intake prevents hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance and reduces lipid peroxidation in fructose-fed rats.

L. Olatunji,A. Soladoye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PATHOPHYS.2006.09.004

2007-05-31

Pathophysiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Application of Formative Evaluation Based on Python Programming in the Cultivation of Clinical Thinking Ability of Residents in Neurosurgery Department

郭洪彬,王筝扬,万英锋,李新伟,王义荣

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200708-01030

2021-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To explore the role of formative evaluation based on Python Programming in improving the clinical reasoning by residents in neurosurgery department.Methods:Totally 116 residents trained in neurosurgery department of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University were randomly divided into test group ( n=49) and control group ( n=67). The residents in the control group were trained with the conventional pathway and while the residents in the Python group received formative assessment once a week in addition to the conventional training. Python programming was used in Python group to quickly make examination questions. At the end of the training, the students will join a final exam and their evaluation of teaching will be collected. Results:The scores of theory and skill in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(89.94±5.43) vs. (84.82±5.73), (80.18±7.23) vs. (73.67±7.48), P<0.01]. In the interview, 61.2% (30/49) of the experimental group students said that the formative evaluation based on python programming was very helpful to improve their capacity of clinical reasoning. Conclusions:The formative assessment based on Python programming can improve the clinical reasoning by residents. This method can be implemented quickly and more frequently as a supplement for the formative assessment of mini-CEX and DOPS.
Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

Joseph Rencic,Lambert W.T. Schuwirth,Larry D. Gruppen,Steven J. Durning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0051

2020-02-06

Diagnosis

Abstract:Abstract Developing valid assessment approaches to clinical reasoning performance has been challenging. Situated cognition theory posits that cognition (e.g. clinical reasoning) emerges from interactions between the clinician and situational (contextual) factors and recognizes an opportunity to gain deeper insights into clinical reasoning performance and its assessment through the study of these interactions. The authors apply situated cognition theory to develop a conceptual model to better understand the assessment of clinical reasoning. The model highlights how the interactions between six contextual factors, including assessee, patient, rater, and environment, assessment method, and task, can impact the outcomes of clinical reasoning performance assessment. Exploring the impact of these interactions can provide insights into the nature of clinical reasoning and its assessment. Three significant implications of this model are: (1) credible clinical reasoning performance assessment requires broad sampling of learners by expert raters in diverse workplace-based contexts; (2) contextual factors should be more explicitly defined and explored; and (3) non-linear statistical models are at times necessary to reveal the complex interactions that can impact clinical reasoning performance assessment.
Teaching Students How to Think: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Preclerkship Clinical Reasoning Instruction

Joseph M Maciuba,Renee Mallory,Luke Surry,Ting Dong,Eulho Jung,Dario Torre,Steven J Durning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad036

2023-05-18

Abstract:Introduction: An objective of undergraduate medical education is to teach students how to think like physicians through a process called clinical reasoning. Currently, clerkship directors often feel that students enter their clinical years with a marginal comprehension of clinical reasoning concepts; instruction in this area could be improved. Although there have been previous educational studies assessing curricular interventions to improve the instruction of clinical reasoning, it is not yet known what happens at an individual level between an instructor and a small group of students in the teaching of clinical reasoning. This research will identify how clinical reasoning is being taught in a longitudinal clinical reasoning course. Methods: The Introduction to Clinical Reasoning course is a 15-month-long case-based course held in the preclinical curriculum of the USU. Individual sessions involve small-group learning with approximately seven students per group. Throughout the academic year of 2018-2019, 10 of these sessions were videotaped and transcribed. All participants provided informed consent. A thematic analysis was performed using a constant comparative approach. Transcripts were analyzed until thematic sufficiency was reached. Results: Over 300 pages of text were analyzed; new themes ceased to be identified after the eighth session. Topics included obstetrics, general pediatric issues, jaundice, and chest pain; these sessions were taught either by attendings, fellows, or fourth-year medical students with attending supervision. The thematic analysis revealed themes associated with clinical reasoning processes, themes associated with knowledge organization, and a theme associated with clinical reasoning in the military. The clinical reasoning process themes included problem list construction and refinement, differential diagnosis, naming and defending a leading diagnosis, and clinical reasoning heuristics. The knowledge organization themes included illness script development and refinement and semantic competence. The final theme was military relevant care. Conclusions: In individual teaching sessions, preceptors emphasized problem lists, differential diagnoses, and leading diagnoses in a course designed to strengthen diagnostic reasoning in preclerkship medical students. The use of illness scripts was more often implicitly used rather than explicitly stated, and students used these sessions to use and apply new vocabularies related to a clinical presentation. Instruction in clinical reasoning could be improved by encouraging faculty to provide further context to their thinking, by encouraging the comparing and contrasting of illness scripts, and by using a shared vocabulary for clinical reasoning. Limitations of this study include that it was done in the context of a clinical reasoning course and that it was done at a military medical school, which may limit generalizability. Future studies could determine if faculty development could improve the frequency of references to the clinical reasoning processes that could improve student readiness for clerkship.
A Pilot Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Pediatric Residents

James Bowen,Catherine Polak,Joanna Thomson,Lisa Herrmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11447

2024-09-25

MedEdPORTAL

Abstract:Introduction: Clinical reasoning (CR) is required for physicians. Pediatric residents often gain CR skills through experiential learning. Currently, deliberate education on CR targeted toward pediatric residents is inconsistent. Our objective was to implement a pilot CR curriculum, including five hour-long sessions, and evaluate its impact on self-identified CR Milestones and comfort with CR skills. Methods: We used Kern's six steps for curriculum development to develop our curriculum. Five morning report sessions included didactics and small-group activities. Pre/post surveys assessed resident self-identified level on ACGME Milestones related to CR skills (Patient Care 4 [PC4] and Medical Knowledge 2 [MK2]) and comfort with CR skills. The postsurvey assessed resident attitudes toward the sessions. Paired samples for Milestone and comfort-based questions were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Attitude questions were reported with descriptive statistics. Results: Each of the five curricular sessions was attended by 40-50 pediatric residents. Seventy-one trainees (58% of residency) and 51 trainees (42% of residency) completed the pre- and postsurveys, respectively, with 20 paired samples. Self-assessment of PC4 (p = .006) and resident comfort with all measured CR skills increased significantly. Of trainees who attended at least one session (n = 44), most reported finding the sessions helpful (97%), relevant to their clinical work (97%), and impactful on their clinical practice (73%). Discussion: Following exposure to this CR curriculum, pediatric residents reported increased self-identified competency levels on the evaluated Milestones and improved comfort with CR skills. Dedicated CR education may advance pediatric resident understanding of and comfort with CR.
Using an experiential learning model to teach clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias: an evaluation of a first-year medical student curriculum

Justin J Choi,Jeanie Gribben,Myriam Lin,Erika L Abramson,Juliet Aizer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2153782

Abstract:Background: Most medical students entering clerkships have limited understanding of clinical reasoning concepts. The value of teaching theories of clinical reasoning and cognitive biases to first-year medical students is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the value of explicitly teaching clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias to first-year medical students. Methods: Using Kolb's experiential learning model, we introduced dual process theory, script theory, and cognitive biases in teaching clinical reasoning to first-year medical students at an academic medical center in New York City between January and June 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, instruction was transitioned to a distance learning format in March 2020. The curriculum included a series of written clinical reasoning examinations with facilitated small group discussions. Written self-assessments prompted each student to reflect on the experience, draw conclusions about their clinical reasoning, and plan for future encounters involving clinical reasoning. We evaluated the value of the curriculum using mixed-methods to analyze faculty assessments, student self-assessment questionnaires, and an end-of-curriculum anonymous questionnaire eliciting student feedback. Results: Among 318 total examinations of 106 students, 254 (80%) had a complete problem representation, while 199 (63%) of problem representations were considered concise. The most common cognitive biases described by students in their clinical reasoning were anchoring bias, availability bias, and premature closure. Four major themes emerged as valuable outcomes of the CREs as identified by students: (1) synthesis of medical knowledge; (2) enhanced ability to generate differential diagnoses; (3) development of self-efficacy related to clinical reasoning; (4) raised awareness of personal cognitive biases. Conclusions: We found that explicitly teaching clinical reasoning theory and cognitive biases using an experiential learning model provides first-year medical students with valuable opportunities for developing knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy related to clinical reasoning.
Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali.

R. Ellis,I. Sagara,A. Durbin,A. Dicko,Donna Shaffer,L. Miller,M. H. Assadou,M. Kone,B. Kamaté,O. Guindo,M. Fay,D. Diallo,O. Doumbo,E. Emanuel,J. Millum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0062

2010-10-05

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract:Initial responses to questionnaires used to assess participants' understanding of informed consent for malaria vaccine trials conducted in the United States and Mali were tallied. Total scores were analyzed by age, sex, literacy (if known), and location. Ninety-two percent (92%) of answers by United States participants and 85% of answers by Malian participants were correct. Questions more likely to be answered incorrectly in Mali related to risk, and to the type of vaccine. For adult participants, independent predictors of higher scores were younger age and female sex in the United States, and male sex in Mali. Scores in the United States were higher than in Mali (P = 0.005). Despite this difference participants at both sites were well informed overall. Although interpretation must be qualified because questionnaires were not intended as research tools and were not standardized among sites, these results do not support concerns about systematic low understanding among research participants in developing versus developed countries.
Steps to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning in dermatology: A scoping review and proposal

Aliya Rodriguez,Christopher Farkouh,Rebecca Raszewski,Claudia Hernandez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.352

2024-03-04

Abstract:Clinical reasoning (CR) is an area of active interest since faults in the diagnostic process can result in errors and possibly delays in care or even patient harm. The purpose of this scoping review was to collect information from the medical literature on approaches utilized to teach and assess CR in dermatology, identify gaps, and prepare a proposal on how to enhance the speciality's ability to develop trainee CR skills. We conducted a review of the published literature (1990-2020) from four databases. The initial search yielded 780 papers, and 42 relevant CR publications met inclusion criteria. Demographic, thematic content, theoretical frameworks, continuum of authenticity, competency/milestone, and assessment/educational intervention data were recorded by two screeners. Trainees at different educational levels from 17 different countries have been assessed in the dermatology literature. Most publications were of a single intervention, appeared underpowered, and had small sample sizes. Only two publications examined work-based assessments (use real patients/stimuli). Knowledge-based studies were the dominant theoretical framework with no studies exclusively focused on process-based CR interventions. Simulation was well represented with 23 (55%) investigations. Rigorous studies that examine CR teaching and assessment in dermatology are lacking. Evidence-based best practices for use of work-based assessments, especially direct observation, need to be developed/adapted for dermatology and validated. Dermatology training programs would benefit from longitudinal data on trainee CR development, process-based CR educational programs, metacognition CR exploration specific to skin disease diagnosis, and studies that yield practical recommendations on how to structure multi-faceted assessments that assess CR.
Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside

Steven J Durning,Eulho Jung,Do-Hwan Kim,Young-Mee Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2024.292

Abstract:Clinical reasoning has been characterized as being an essential aspect of being a physician. Despite this, clinical reasoning has a variety of definitions and medical error, which is often attributed to clinical reasoning, has been reported to be a leading cause of death in the United States and abroad. Further, instructors struggle with teaching this essential ability which often does not play a significant role in the curriculum. In this article, we begin with defining clinical reasoning and then discuss four principles from the literature as well as a variety of techniques for teaching these principles to help ground an instructors' understanding in clinical reasoning. We also tackle contemporary challenges in teaching clinical reasoning such as the integration of artificial intelligence and strategies to help with transitions in instruction (e.g., from the classroom to the clinic or from medical school to residency/registrar training) and suggest next steps for research and innovation in clinical reasoning.
Implementation of three knowledge-oriented instructional strategies to teach clinical reasoning: Self-explanation, a concept mapping exercise, and deliberate reflection: AMEE Guide No. 150

Dario Torre,Martine Chamberland,Silvia Mamede

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2105200

IF: 4.277

2022-08-09

Medical Teacher

Abstract:The teaching of clinical reasoning is essential in medical education. This guide has been written to provide educators with practical advice on the design, development, and implementation of three knowledge-oriented instructional strategies for the teaching of clinical reasoning to medical students: Self-explanation (SE), a Clinical Reasoning Mapping Exercise (CREsME), and Deliberate Reflection (DR). We first synthesize the theoretical tenets that support the use of these strategies, including knowledge organization, and development of illness scripts. We then provide a detailed description of the key components of each strategy, emphasizing the practical applications of each one by sharing specific examples. We also explore the potential for a combined application of these strategies in a longitudinal and developmental approach to teaching clinical reasoning at the undergraduate level. Finally, we discuss enablers and barriers in the implementation and integration of these teaching strategies while taking into consideration curricular needs, context, and resources. We are aware that many strategies exist and are not arguing that SE, CReSME, and DR are the most effective ones or the only ones to be adopted. Nevertheless, we selected these strategies because of overarching theoretical principles, empirical evidence supporting their use, and our own experience with them. We are hoping to provide practical advice on the implementation of these strategies to practicing educators who aim at developing an integrated approach to the teaching of clinical reasoning to medical students at different stages of their development.

education, scientific disciplines,health care sciences & services
Minding the gap: towards a shared clinical reasoning lexicon across the pre-clerkship/clerkship transition

Robin K. Ovitsh,Shanu Gupta,Anita Kusnoor,Jennifer M. Jackson,Danielle Roussel,Christopher J. Mooney,Roshini Pinto-Powell,Joel L. Appel,Rahul Mhaskar,Jonathan Gold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2307715

IF: 6

2024-02-08

Medical Education Online

Abstract:Teaching and learning of clinical reasoning are core principles of medical education. However, little guidance exists for faculty leaders to navigate curricular transitions between pre-clerkship and clerkship curricular phases. This study compares how educational leaders in these two phases understand clinical reasoning instruction. Previously reported cross-sectional surveys of pre-clerkship clinical skills course directors, and clerkship leaders were compared. Comparisons focused on perceived importance of a number of core clinical reasoning concepts, barriers to clinical reasoning instruction, level of familiarity across the undergraduate medical curriculum, and inclusion of clinical reasoning instruction in each area of the curriculum. Analyses were performed using the Mann Whitney U test. Both sets of leaders rated lack of curricular time as the largest barrier to teaching clinical reasoning. Clerkship leaders also noted a lack of faculty with skills to teach clinical reasoning concepts as a significant barrier ( p < 0.02), while pre-clerkship leaders were more likely to perceive that these concepts were too advanced for their students ( p < 0.001). Pre-clerkship leaders reported a higher level of familiarity with the clerkship curriculum than clerkship leaders reported of the pre-clerkship curriculum ( p < 0.001). As faculty transition students from the pre-clerkship to the clerkship phase, a shared understanding of what is taught and when, accompanied by successful faculty development, may aid the development of longitudinal, milestone-based clinical reasoning instruction.

education & educational research
An electron-deficient metallocavitand with an unusual selectivity towards substituted benzene derivatives during co-crystallizations.

Chang-cang Huang,Jian‐Jun Liu,Yong Chen,Meijin Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc46022c

IF: 4.9

2013-11-15

Chemical Communications

Abstract:A double-wall-hourglass-shaped metallocavitand bearing an electron-deficient cavity was self-assembled, which exhibited an unusual selectivity to substituted benzene derivatives of different electron density during co-crystallizations.
Is "No News is Good News" Enough? A Thematic Analysis Exploring Clinical Reasoning Assessment in Pediatric Residency Programs

James Bowen,Matthew Kelleher,Benjamin Kinnear,Daniel Schumacher,David A. Turner,Lisa E. Herrmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102600

IF: 2.993

2024-11-06

Academic Pediatrics

Abstract:Objective Clinical reasoning (CR) includes numerous essential skills for clinicians, but how these skills are assessed in pediatric residency training is not well described. This study aimed to explore pediatric residency program leader perspectives on clinical reasoning assessment and identification of trainee deficiencies in this area. Methods Taking a social constructionist worldview, we conducted a thematic analysis of 20 semi-structured interviews with pediatric residency program leaders. Interviews explored how pediatric residency programs assess CR and how deficiencies are identified. Recruitment and analysis continued iteratively until thematic sufficiency was reached. Member checking enhanced trustworthiness of the results. Results Participants noted a perceived lack of a shared mental model for CR assessment between program leaders and clinical supervisors. Four themes were generated to highlight CR assessment in pediatric residency programs: 1) Clinical supervisors escalate concerns about behaviors representing symptoms of CR deficits rather than diagnosing CR competency deficiencies and that CR assessment requires: 2) an outward display of autonomous decision-making, 3) psychologically safe environments for inquiry, and 4) longitudinal, individualized observation. Elements of pediatric residency programs that impede CR assessment were identified, including family-centered rounds and team-based clinical care. Conclusions This study identified key components necessary for CR assessment and barriers that may lead to missed identification of deficiencies. While no single solution can create an ideal environment for CR assessment, this study identifies elements for enhancing assessment opportunities for early identification of deficiencies.

pediatrics
Using Group History-Taking and Individual Reasoning to Identify Shortcomings in Clinical Reasoning for Medical Students

Kuan-Hao Cheng,Chi-Yu Lee,Yih-Jer Wu,Ching-Chung Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241280946

2024-09-16

Abstract:Objective: It is crucial that teaching faculties determine and remain informed of medical school learners' clinical reasoning competence. We created an innovative assessment method for fourth-year medical students to identify deficiencies in various components of their clinical reasoning ability. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study of fourth-year medical students' reasoning assessments from 2019 to 2022. Teams of four-five trainees questioned standardized patients in clinical scenarios, including fever, abdominal pain, and weight loss. They then individually documented key information to reflect comprehension of patient problems. Trainees were tasked with differentiating diagnoses and associated statuses and reaching the most likely diagnosis along with two tentative diagnoses. The correlations observed between 2020 and 2022 for abdominal pain were analyzed using student t-tests. Results: A total of 177 students participated in this study. Across the scenarios, there was no significant difference in key information representation scores (56%-58%). Reasoning ability scores were 49% for fever, 57% for abdominal pain, and 61% for weight loss. A comparison between 2020 and 2022 revealed a significant improvement in the objective structured clinical examination scores and differential diagnoses (P < .01). Shortcomings included brief chief complaint duration, lack of detailed presentation, and insufficient description of negative information. Differential diagnosis and diagnostic justification were inadequate for acute and chronic conditions, and disease location clarity within the organ system was lacking. On average, students presented two correct diagnoses. Conclusions: Fourth-year medical students exhibited inadequate reasoning abilities, particularly in fever and abdominal pain scenarios, with deficiencies in hypothesis generation and differential diagnosis. Group history-taking with individual reasoning assessment identified students' shortcomings and provided faculty feedback to improve their teaching strategies.
Fostering clinical reasoning ability in preclinical students through an illness script worksheet approach in flipped learning: a quasi-experimental study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05614-9

IF: 3.263

2024-06-14

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:The consensus that clinical reasoning should be explicitly addressed throughout medical training is increasing; however, studies on specific teaching methods, particularly, for preclinical students, are lacking. This study investigated the effects of an illness script worksheet approach in flipped learning on the development of clinical reasoning abilities in preclinical students. It also explored whether the impact of this intervention differed depending on clinical reasoning ability after dividing the students into high and low groups based on their pre-diagnostic thinking inventory (DTI) scores.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
Evaluating the effectiveness of illness script teaching on clinical reasoning skills in post-baccalaureate nursing students

Yu-Lin Wu,Ming-Chun Lai,Wen-Pei Chang,Yu-Huei Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106401

IF: 3.906

2024-09-14

Nurse Education Today

Abstract:Background Typically, nurse education curricula are separated into the teaching of theoretical knowledge and practical skills. This separation may hinder nursing students' development of clinical reasoning skills, making it difficult for them to prioritize tasks and make decisions about interventions. Illness scripts have been shown to help medical students improve their clinical reasoning skills; however, they are rarely used in nurse education. Objectives To evaluate the influence of illness script teaching method on post-baccalaureate nursing students' clinical reasoning skills. Design The study adopted a single-arm quantitative pre-experimental research design and incorporated qualitative focus group discussions. Settings/participants This study was conducted at a university in northern Taiwan. Participants included 35 post-baccalaureate nursing students who were enrolled in an elective course focused on clinical skills. Methods To enhance nursing students' clinical reasoning skills, illness scripts for five clinical scenarios were developed and implemented as part of their curriculum. The Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale was utilized to assess self-rated clinical reasoning abilities, while dual-teacher scoring was used to evaluate clinical reasoning objectively. The VARK learning preference questionnaire was used to examine how learning preferences affect learning outcomes. After the course, semi-structured focus groups were held to collect student feedback on the effectiveness of the teaching methods and the learning outcomes. Results This study's quantitative and qualitative results show that illness script-based teaching improves nursing students' clinical reasoning. Quantitative results showed significant objective reasoning score improvements. However, minimal changes in self-rated scores suggest a learning style-influenced gap between perceived and actual abilities. Qualitative findings showed that students valued linking clinical issues to practical applications but struggled with knowledge gaps and engagement. Conclusions The illness script teaching method improved students' understanding of clinical scenarios and enhanced their clinical reasoning abilities. Incorporating illness scripts into nurse education was beneficial for nursing students.

nursing,education, scientific disciplines
Implementation of Chief Complaint-Based Clinical Reasoning Training in Periodontal Internships

Panpan Wang,Li Gao,Yang Ning,Yue Zheng,Chi Zhang,Lingping Tan,Chuanjiang Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.09.020

2024-10-02

Abstract:Background: The gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical skills highlights the need for clinical reasoning training curriculum in periodontal education, especially in periodontal internships. This study aims to develop a Chief Complaint-Based Clinical Reasoning Training (CCB-CRT) program and evaluate its impact on periodontal interns' clinical reasoning abilities and overall performance. Methods: The CCB-CRT program was developed based on eight common chief complaints (CCs) identified through surveys of periodontal specialists and an analysis of patient visit data from a university-affiliated hospital's periodontal clinic. The study involved a comparison between a control group of fifth-year dental students (2021) and a CCB-CRT group (2022). Both groups completed an 8-week training course. The CCB-CRT group received additional training focused on the 8 common CCs, using student-led discussions, flipped classroom, mind mapping, and presentations. Evaluation criteria included overall performance, disease diagnosis and treatment plan, misdiagnosis rates, and students' satisfaction. Results: After 1 year of CCB-CRT implementation, participants in the CCB-CRT group showed substantial improvements in overall performance, diagnostic accuracy, and satisfaction compared to traditional teaching methods. The program enhanced students' understanding of theoretical knowledge, improved their interpretation of clinical manifestations and examination results, and enhanced their clinical reasoning skills and diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: The successful application of the CCB-CRT program in periodontology education demonstrates its efficacy in improving clinical reasoning skills and diagnostic efficiency among students. The structured approach facilitates the transition from theoretical knowledge to practical application, contributing to better patient care in periodontal practice.
Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education: A Primer for Medical Students

Graham Ka-Hon Shea,Pun-Chuen Chan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2023.2230201

2023-07-03

Abstract:Issue: Proper application of clinical reasoning is a prerequisite toward safe practice. Formal instruction on clinical reasoning remains lacking in medical curricula, especially in preparation for the transition from pre-clinical to clinical years. Evidence: Although medical educators have published abundantly on clinical reasoning and acknowledge this to be an essential part of medical education, there remains a global curricular deficiency in developing this skillset. Here we introduce the reader to clinical reasoning frameworks with an emphasis upon practical application. Our focus is upon medical students transitioning from pre-clinical to clinical years of medical school who tend to be overwhelmed with facts but have limited sense of diagnostic approaches due to lack of instruction. Implications: In understanding systematic approaches to clinical reasoning of relevance to medical diagnosis, students will be able to process knowledge in a clinically relevant and discriminatory manner to facilitate problem solving. Upon internship and residency, they will be better prepared for self-learning and reflection as they understand how to hone their capability for diagnosis and management. Medical educators need to acknowledge that clinical reasoning is a practical academic discipline requiring greater curricular emphasis.
TRAFFIC DATA SETS FOR INTRUSION DETECTION RESEARCH

Thomas H. Morris,W. Gao

Abstract:Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems monitor and control physical processes associated with the critical infrastructure. Weaknesses in the application layer protocols, however, leave SCADA networks vulnerable to attack. In response, cyber security researchers have developed myriad intrusion detection systems. Researchers primarily rely on unique threat models and the corresponding network traffic data sets to train and validate their intrusion detection systems. This leads to a situation in which researchers cannot independently verify the results, cannot compare the effectiveness of different instruction detection systems, and cannot adequately validate the ability of intrusion detection systems to detect various classes of attacks. Indeed, a common data set is needed that can be used by researchers to compare intrusion detection approaches and implementations. This paper describes four data sets, which include network traffic, process control and process measurement features from a set of 28 attacks against two laboratory-scale industrial control systems that use the MODBUS application layer protocol. The data sets, which are freely available, enable effective comparisons of intrusion detection solutions for SCADA sys-
Evaluating Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Value of a Virtual Oral Assessment

Michelle Jeffery,A Reema Kar,Archana Pradhan,Samantha Brannigan,Carol Terregino,Hanin Rashid,Rick Salisbury,Conrad Johnson,Sugeet Jagpal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241250049

Abstract:Background: Oral assessments are essential components of board certification in numerous fields, as they provide insight into problem-solving capacity and clinical reasoning. The development of clinical reasoning often begins in undergraduate medical education and remains a challenge to assess. Objective: We developed a pilot oral assessment to evaluate medical student oral presentations and systematically assess clinical reasoning. This was incorporated into a previously existing cumulative assessment at the conclusion of the third year of medical school, with the intent to demonstrate feasibility and future reliability of this exam format. Methods: This pilot oral assessment was developed using content taught during third year clerkships. A modified Assessment of Reasoning Tool (ART) was used as the evaluation metric. It was conducted virtually to include faculty members from multiple disciplines and accommodate schedules and space limitations. Results: A total of 152 third year medical students completed the exam, with a total of 15 faculty examiners. 89% of medical students scored as complete in hypothesis directed history, 93% in problem representation, 86% in prioritized differential diagnoses, and 67% in effectively directing management. Most examiners felt an oral assessment is effective to determine a medical student's clinical reasoning ability. Conclusions: Virtual oral assessments of clinical reasoning can be incorporated in undergraduate medical education to identify students struggling with components of clinical reasoning, while also allowing maximum flexibility for the clinician educator workforce as examiners. Longitudinal use of these exams would be valuable to track the development of clinical reasoning across the medical school curriculum.
The Effect of a 13-Hour Curriculum To Improve Residents' Teaching Skills

Elizabeth H. Morrison,Lloyd Rucker,John R. Boker,Charles C. Gabbert,F. Allan Hubbell,Maurice A. Hitchcock,Michael D. Prislin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00005

IF: 39.2

2004-08-17

Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Although resident physicians often teach, few trials have tested interventions to improve residents' teaching skills. A pilot trial in 2001-2002 found that 13 trained resident teachers taught better than did untrained control residents.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a longitudinal residents-as-teachers curriculum improves residents' teaching skills.DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial from May 2001 to February 2002 (pilot trial) and March 2002 to April 2003.SETTING: 4 generalist residencies affiliated with an urban academic medical center.PARTICIPANTS: 62 second-year residents: 23 in the 2001-2002 pilot trial and 39 more in 2002-2003; 27 of the 39 participants were medicine residents required to learn teaching skills.INTERVENTION: A 13-hour curriculum in which residents practiced teaching and received feedback during 1-hour small-group sessions taught twice monthly for 6 months.MEASUREMENTS: A 3.5-hour, 8-station, objective structured teaching examination that was enacted and rated by 50 medical students before and after the intervention. Two trained, blinded raters independently assessed each station (inter-rater reliability, 0.75).RESULTS: In the combined results for 2001-2003, the intervention group (n = 33) and control group (n = 29) were similar in sex, specialty, and academic performance. On a 1 to 5 Likert scale, intervention residents outscored controls on overall improvement score (post-test-pretest difference, 0.74 vs. 0.07; difference between intervention and control groups, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.81]; P < 0.001) by a magnitude of 2.8 standard deviations and on all 8 individual stations. The intervention residents improved 28.5% overall, whereas the scores of control residents did not increase significantly (2.7%). In 2002-2003, 19 intervention residents similarly outscored 19 controls (post-test-pretest difference, 0.83 vs. 0.14; difference between intervention and control groups, 0.69 [CI, 0.53 to 0.84]; P < 0.001). Twenty-seven medicine residents required to learn teaching skills achieved scores similar to those of volunteers.LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted at a single institution. No "real life" assessment with which to compare the results of the objective structured teaching examination was available.CONCLUSIONS: Generalist residents randomly assigned to receive a 13-hour longitudinal residents-as-teachers curriculum consistently showed improved teaching skills, as judged by medical student raters. Residents required to participate improved as much as volunteers did.

medicine, general & internal

Increased magnesium intake prevents hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance and reduces lipid peroxidation in fructose-fed rats.

Application of Formative Evaluation Based on Python Programming in the Cultivation of Clinical Thinking Ability of Residents in Neurosurgery Department

Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

Teaching Students How to Think: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Preclerkship Clinical Reasoning Instruction

A Pilot Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Pediatric Residents

Using an experiential learning model to teach clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias: an evaluation of a first-year medical student curriculum

Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali.

Steps to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning in dermatology: A scoping review and proposal

Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside

Implementation of three knowledge-oriented instructional strategies to teach clinical reasoning: Self-explanation, a concept mapping exercise, and deliberate reflection: AMEE Guide No. 150

Minding the gap: towards a shared clinical reasoning lexicon across the pre-clerkship/clerkship transition

An electron-deficient metallocavitand with an unusual selectivity towards substituted benzene derivatives during co-crystallizations.

Is "No News is Good News" Enough? A Thematic Analysis Exploring Clinical Reasoning Assessment in Pediatric Residency Programs

Using Group History-Taking and Individual Reasoning to Identify Shortcomings in Clinical Reasoning for Medical Students

Fostering clinical reasoning ability in preclinical students through an illness script worksheet approach in flipped learning: a quasi-experimental study

Evaluating the effectiveness of illness script teaching on clinical reasoning skills in post-baccalaureate nursing students

Implementation of Chief Complaint-Based Clinical Reasoning Training in Periodontal Internships

Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education: A Primer for Medical Students

TRAFFIC DATA SETS FOR INTRUSION DETECTION RESEARCH

Evaluating Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Value of a Virtual Oral Assessment

The Effect of a 13-Hour Curriculum To Improve Residents' Teaching Skills