Abstract:Introduction: An objective of undergraduate medical education is to teach students how to think like physicians through a process called clinical reasoning. Currently, clerkship directors often feel that students enter their clinical years with a marginal comprehension of clinical reasoning concepts; instruction in this area could be improved. Although there have been previous educational studies assessing curricular interventions to improve the instruction of clinical reasoning, it is not yet known what happens at an individual level between an instructor and a small group of students in the teaching of clinical reasoning. This research will identify how clinical reasoning is being taught in a longitudinal clinical reasoning course. Methods: The Introduction to Clinical Reasoning course is a 15-month-long case-based course held in the preclinical curriculum of the USU. Individual sessions involve small-group learning with approximately seven students per group. Throughout the academic year of 2018-2019, 10 of these sessions were videotaped and transcribed. All participants provided informed consent. A thematic analysis was performed using a constant comparative approach. Transcripts were analyzed until thematic sufficiency was reached. Results: Over 300 pages of text were analyzed; new themes ceased to be identified after the eighth session. Topics included obstetrics, general pediatric issues, jaundice, and chest pain; these sessions were taught either by attendings, fellows, or fourth-year medical students with attending supervision. The thematic analysis revealed themes associated with clinical reasoning processes, themes associated with knowledge organization, and a theme associated with clinical reasoning in the military. The clinical reasoning process themes included problem list construction and refinement, differential diagnosis, naming and defending a leading diagnosis, and clinical reasoning heuristics. The knowledge organization themes included illness script development and refinement and semantic competence. The final theme was military relevant care. Conclusions: In individual teaching sessions, preceptors emphasized problem lists, differential diagnoses, and leading diagnoses in a course designed to strengthen diagnostic reasoning in preclerkship medical students. The use of illness scripts was more often implicitly used rather than explicitly stated, and students used these sessions to use and apply new vocabularies related to a clinical presentation. Instruction in clinical reasoning could be improved by encouraging faculty to provide further context to their thinking, by encouraging the comparing and contrasting of illness scripts, and by using a shared vocabulary for clinical reasoning. Limitations of this study include that it was done in the context of a clinical reasoning course and that it was done at a military medical school, which may limit generalizability. Future studies could determine if faculty development could improve the frequency of references to the clinical reasoning processes that could improve student readiness for clerkship.

Evaluating clinical reasoning in first year DPT students using a script concordance test

The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: a national validation study

Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

The Impact of Script Concordance Testing on Clinical Decision-Making in Paramedic Education

Script Concordance and the Think-Aloud Approach Through the Lens of Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory

Evaluation of the reliability of diagnostic thinking inventory for physical therapist and of the development of clinical reasoning in physiotherapy students

Fostering clinical reasoning ability in preclinical students through an illness script worksheet approach in flipped learning: a quasi-experimental study

Evaluating the effectiveness of illness script teaching on clinical reasoning skills in post-baccalaureate nursing students

Theory-guided teaching: Implementation of a clinical reasoning curriculum in residents

Teaching Students How to Think: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Preclerkship Clinical Reasoning Instruction

Evaluating Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Value of a Virtual Oral Assessment

Preliminary Validation of a Clinical Reasoning Theory-Based Assessment Rubric: An e-Delphi Study

Developing a Situational Judgement Test to Assess Clinical Judgement in Fourth-Year Medical Students: A Pilot Study

Teaching and Assessing Clinical Reasoning Skills

Comparison between MCQ, Extended matching questions (EMQ) and Script concordance test (SCT) for assessment among first-year medical students - A pilot study

Development and Validation of a Formative Assessment Tool for Nephrology Fellows' Clinical Reasoning

Assessing clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students during history taking with an empirically derived scale for clinical reasoning indicators

Using Group History-Taking and Individual Reasoning to Identify Shortcomings in Clinical Reasoning for Medical Students

Use of a clinical reasoning scaffolding document improves student performance

The influence of a digital clinical reasoning test on medical student learning behavior during clinical clerkships

Assessing clinical reasoning in the OSCE: pilot-testing a novel oral debrief exercise