Abstract:Background: Research with college students has supported a model of writing approaches that defines the relationship between a writer and writing task along a deep and surface process continuum (Biggs, 1988). Based on that model, Lavelle (1993) developed the Inventory of Processes in College Composition which reflects students' motives and strategies as related to writing outcomes. It is also important to define the approaches of secondary students to better understand writing processes at that level, and development in written composition. Aims: This study was designed to define the writing approaches of secondary students by factor analysing students' responses to items regarding writing beliefs and writing strategies, and to compare the secondary approaches to those of college students. A related goal was to explore the relationships of the secondary writing approaches to perceived self-regulatory efficacy for writing (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), writing preferences, and writing outcomes. Samples: The initial, factor analytic phase involved 398 junior level high school students (11th grade) enrolled in a mandatory language arts class at each of three large Midwestern high schools (USA). Then, 49 junior level students enrolled in two language arts classes participated as subjects in the second phase. Method: Classroom teachers administered the Inventory of Processes in College Composition (Lavelle, 1993), which contained 72 true-or-false items regarding writing beliefs and strategies, during regular class periods. Data were factor analysed and the structure compared to that of college students. In the second phase, the new inventory, Inventory of Processes in Secondary Composition, was administered in conjunction with the Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Writing Inventory (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), and a writing preferences survey. A writing sample and grade in Language Arts classes were obtained and served as outcome variables. Results: The factor structure of secondary writing reflected three process dimensions. The first factor, Elaborative-Expressive, describes a writing strategy based on personal investment and audience concern. The second factor, Planful-Procedural, denotes sticking to a plan, following the rules, and 'preparing' for writing. Achieving-Competitive, the third factor, reflects a 'teacher pleasing' strategy or doing only what needs to be done to get a good grade. Two factors from the college model, Elaborative and Procedural, were replicated, and two were not, Reflective-Revision and Low Self-Efficacy. Regression analyses supported that the processes in writing under a timed condition are different from those used when writing over time, and that students' perceptions of writing self-regulatory efficacy were predictive of writing success under both conditions.

shared understanding of good writing?

The impact of a changed writing environment on students' motivation to write

Writing to the Common Core: teachers’ responses to changes in standards and assessments for writing in elementary schools

The problem of grammar teaching: a case study of the relationship between a teacher's beliefs and pedagogical practice

Teaching creative writing in primary schools: a systematic review of the literature through the lens of reflexivity

Early childhood teachers' writing beliefs and practices

Written Discourse Investigation a Study Based on Undergraduate Students

Structuring written arguments in primary and secondary school: A systemic functional linguistics perspective

The Writing Achievement, Metacognitive Knowledge of Writing and Motivation of Middle-School Students with Learning Difficulties

The writing approaches of secondary students

What About Writing? A National Exploratory Study of Writing Instruction in Teacher Preparation Programs

Teacher’s perspective on how to promote children’s learning in reading and writing

The Not-So-Simple View of Writing in Struggling Readers/Writers

Explicit embodiment of narrative worlds: a case study of student-teacher concept-led grammar conferencing for writing

EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Classroom Writing Assessment at High Schools in Central Vietnam

“I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks

Supporting student writing and other modes of learning and assessment: a staff guide

Writing assessment for communities of writers: rubric validation to support formative assessment of writing in Pre-K to grade 2

Conceptions and Beliefs About “Good Teaching”: An integration of contrasting research areas

Teaching argumentative non-fiction writing to 7–14 year olds: a systematic review of the evidence of successful practice

Approaches to written assignments -how students write, and instructors read