Abstract:This article investigates the feasibility of using automated scoring methods to evaluate the quality of student-written essays. In 2012, Kaggle hosted an Automated Student Assessment Prize contest to find effective solutions to automated testing and grading. This article: a) analyzes the datasets from the contest – which contained hand-graded essays – to measure their suitability for developing competent automated grading tools; b) evaluates the potential for deep learning in automated essay scoring (AES) to produce sophisticated testing and grading algorithms; c) advocates for thorough and transparent performance reports on AES research, which will facilitate fairer comparisons among various AES systems and permit study replication; d) uses both deep neural networks and state-of-the-art NLP tools to predict finer-grained rubric scores, to illustrate how rubric scores are determined from a linguistic perspective, and to uncover important features of an effective rubric scoring model. This study's findings first highlight the level of agreement that exists between two human raters for each rubric as captured in the investigated essay dataset, that is, 0.60 on average as measured by the quadratic weighted kappa (QWK). Only one related study has been found in the literature which also performed rubric score predictions through models trained on the same dataset. At best, the predictive models had an average agreement level (QWK) of 0.53 with the human raters, below the level of agreement among human raters. In contrast, this research's findings report an average agreement level per rubric with the two human raters' resolved scores of 0.72 (QWK), well beyond the agreement level between the two human raters. Further, the AES system proposed in this article predicts holistic essay scores through its predicted rubric scores and produces a QWK of 0.78, a competitive performance according to recent literature where cutting-edge AES tools generate agreement levels between 0.77 and 0.81, results computed as per the same procedure as in this article. This study's AES system goes one step further toward interpretability and the provision of high-level explanations to justify the predicted holistic and rubric scores. It contends that predicting rubric scores is essential to automated essay scoring, because it reveals the reasoning behind AIED-based AES systems. Will building AIED accountability improve the trustworthiness of the formative feedback generated by AES? Will AIED-empowered AES systems thoroughly mimic, or even outperform, a competent human rater? Will such machine-grading systems be subjected to verification by human raters, thus paving the way for a human-in-the-loop assessment mechanism? Will trust in new generations of AES systems be improved with the addition of models that explain the inner workings of a deep learning black box? This study seeks to expand these horizons of AES to make the technique practical, explainable, and trustable.

Assessing Students’ Use of Evidence and Organization in Response-to-Text Writing: Using Natural Language Processing for Rubric-Based Automated Scoring

Word Embedding for Response-To-Text Assessment of Evidence

Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system

Utilizing Natural Language Processing for Automated Assessment of Classroom Discussion

Examining the Effects of a Real-Time, Knowledge-Aware Tool for Academic Writing Assessment

eRevise: Using Natural Language Processing to Provide Formative Feedback on Text Evidence Usage in Student Writing

Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

AI-assisted automated scoring of picture-cued writing tasks for language assessment

Automatic short answer grading and feedback using text mining methods

Application of an Automated Essay Scoring engine to English writing assessment using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement

Automated Essay Scoring and the Deep Learning Black Box: How Are Rubric Scores Determined?

Applying natural language processing to automatically assess student conceptual understanding from textual responses

Automatic Scoring of Students' Science Writing Using Hybrid Neural Network

A Chain-of-Thought Prompting Approach with LLMs for Evaluating Students' Formative Assessment Responses in Science

Machine Learning Mixed Methods Text Analysis: An Illustration From Automated Scoring Models of Student Writing in Biology Education

Automated Writing Evaluation Using Sentence by Sentence Scoring Model

Intelligent Scoring of English Composition by Machine Learning from the Perspective of Natural Language Processing

Applying large language models and chain-of-thought for automatic scoring

Automated Scoring for Reading Comprehension via In-context BERT Tuning

English Language Proficiency Analysis and Prediction using Deep Learning Algorithms

Annotation and Classification of Evidence and Reasoning Revisions in Argumentative Writing