Abstract:The current products are TOPCon cell, which is more suitable for bifacial solar cell with the highest theoretical limiting efficiency of 27.62%, and SHJ and PERC cells, with theoretical limiting efficiency of 26.91% and 26.42%, respectively. The next‐generation products may be heterojunction back‐contact (HBC) and TOPCon back‐contact (TBC) cells with high theoretical limiting efficiency of 28.12% and 27.99%, respectively. Currently, the efficiency of p‐type passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) cells has been growing at an absolute efficiency of 0.5% per year and has reached 23%–23.5% in mass production while getting closer to its theoretical efficiency limit. n‐Type tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) and silicon heterojunction (SHJ) cells with their superior "passivating selective contacts" technology were the most interesting photovoltaics (PV) technology in the industry. The effect of different passivated contact layers with respect to their influence on the J0, J0,metal, ρc, and the carrier selectivity (S10) and the loss analysis and efficiency potential of industrial‐type PERC, TOPCon, and SHJ solar cells were studied and compared. The results showed that TOPCon structure with a high passivation performance and good optical performance is more suitable for bifacial solar cell and the highest theoretical limiting efficiency with metal shading on the n‐type Si wafer (ηb,e,h,m,max) can be achieved to 27.62%. Although SHJ structure with the highest passivation performance but the worst optical performance owing to the parasitic absorption of a‐Si:H layer and high contact resistivity, the value of ηb,e,h,m,max is 0.7% lower than that of TOPCon solar cells. PERC structure has superior optical performance than SHJ structure, but due to poor passivation performance, the ηb,e,h,m,max is only 26.42%. The next‐generation products may be heterojunction back‐contact (HBC) and TOPCon back‐contact (TBC) cells with high ηb,e,h,m,max of 28.12% and 27.99%, respectively. Exploiting a perfect passivation of the noncontact area, the wide process window and low cost are required and transferring these new concepts to industrial solar cell production will be the next major challenge.

Passivated Emitter and Rear Totally Diffused: PERT Solar Cell-An Overview

Industry related approaches for bifacial p-type PERX solar cells

Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Silicon Solar Cells with a Front Polysilicon Passivating Contacted Selective Emitter

TOPerc solar cell: An integral approach of TOPCon and PERC architectures for achieving efficiency beyond 25%

Industrial Silicon Solar Cells Applying the Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC) Concept—A Review

Characterization of Bifacial Passivated Emitter and Rear Contact Solar Cell

High-efficiency N-Type Silicon PERT Bifacial Solar Cells with Selective Emitters and Poly-Si Based Passivating Contacts

A comparative study on alternative industrial manufacturing routes for bifacial n‐PERT silicon solar cells

Electrical Performance, Loss Analysis, and Efficiency Potential of Industrial‐Type PERC, TOPCon, and SHJ Solar Cells: A Comparative Study

Improved Bifacial Properties of P‐Type Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Solar Cells toward High Mass Production Efficiency

22.13% Efficient Industrial P-Type Mono Perc Solar Cell

Development of the PERC Solar Cell

Numerical study of mono-crystalline silicon solar cells with passivated emitter and rear contact configuration for the efficiency beyond 24% based on mass production technology

High Performance Inverted RbCsFAPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Interface Engineering and Defects Passivation.

Optimization of rear surface roughness and metal grid design in industrial bifacial PERC solar cells

How to make PERC suitable for perovskite–silicon tandem solar cells: A simulation study

Industrail Technology of Passivated Emitter and Rear Cells with Silicon Oxynitride and Silicon Nitride As Rear Passivation for High Efficiency BIPV Modules

Improvement of Light Trapping in Bifacial PERC Silicon Solar Cells by Optimizing the Rear Surface Morphology

22.8% efficient ion implanted PERC solar cell with a roadmap to achieve 23.5% efficiency: A process and device simulation study

Effective Way to Reduce Rear-Side Potential-Induced Degradation of Bifacial PERC Solar Cells

Quantitative Understanding and Implementation of Screen Printed p+ Poly-Si/Oxide Passivated Contact to Enhance the Efficiency of p-PERC Cells