Abstract:Healthy adults flexibly adapt their learning strategies to ongoing changes in uncertainty, a key feature of adaptive behaviour. However, the developmental trajectory of this ability is yet unknown, as developmental studies have not incorporated trial-to-trial variation in uncertainty in their analyses or models. To address this issue, we compared adolescents' and adults' trial-to-trial dynamics of uncertainty, learning rate, and exploration in two tasks that assess learning in noisy but otherwise stable environments. In an estimation task—which provides direct indices of trial-specific learning rate—both age groups reduced their learning rate over time, as self-reported uncertainty decreased. Accordingly, the estimation data in both groups was better explained by a Bayesian model with dynamic learning rate (Kalman filter) than by conventional reinforcement-learning models. Furthermore, adolescents' learning rates asymptoted at a higher level, reflecting an over-weighting of the most recent outcome, and the estimated Kalman-filter parameters suggested that this was due to an overestimation of environmental volatility. In a choice task, both age groups became more likely to choose the higher-valued option over time, but this increase in choice accuracy was smaller in the adolescents. In contrast to the estimation task, we found no evidence for a Bayesian expectation-updating process in the choice task, suggesting that estimation and choice tasks engage different learning processes. However, our modeling results of the choice task suggested that both age groups reduced their degree of exploration over time, and that the adolescents explored overall more than the adults. Finally, age-related differences in exploration parameters from fits to the choice data were mediated by participants' volatility parameter from fits to the estimation data. Together, these results suggest that adolescents overestimate the rate of environmental change, resulting in elevated learning rates and increased exploration, which may help understand developmental changes in learning and decision-making.To successfully learn the value of stimuli and actions, people should take into account their current (un)certainty about these values: Learning rates and exploration should be high when one's value estimates are highly uncertain (in the beginning of learning), and decrease over time as evidence accumulates and uncertainty decreases. Recent studies have shown that healthy adults flexibly adapt their learning strategies based on ongoing changes in uncertainty, consistent with normative learning. However, the development of this ability prior to adulthood is yet unknown, as developmental learning studies have not considered trial-to-trial changes in uncertainty. Here, we show that adolescents, as compared to adults, showed a smaller decrease in both learning rate and exploration over time. Computational modeling revealed that both of these effects were due to adolescents overestimating the amount of environmental volatility, which made them more sensitive to recent relative to older evidence. The overestimation of volatility during adolescence may represent the rapidly changing environmental demands during this developmental period, and can help understand the surge in real-life risk taking and exploratory behaviours characteristic of adolescents.

The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account

Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians

Subjective confidence influences word learning in a cross-situational statistical learning task

Cue Predictiveness and Uncertainty Determine Cue Representation During Visual Statistical Learning.

Two determinants of dynamic adaptive learning for magnitudes and probabilities

Further perceptions of probability: Accurate, stepwise updating is contingent on prior information about the task and the response mode

Subjective confidence modulates individual BOLD patterns of predictive processing

Modeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm.

Humans use overconfident estimates of auditory spatial and temporal uncertainty for perceptual inference

Priors for natural image statistics inform confidence in perceptual decisions

Confidence in Decision-Making During Probabilistic Tactile Learning Related to Distinct Thalamo-Prefrontal Pathways.

Identification of Probabilities

Adaptive Integration of Perceptual and Reward Information in an Uncertain World

Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer

Infant Statisticians: The Origins of Reasoning Under Uncertainty

Endogenous Precision of the Number Sense

How Likely Is it that I Would Act the Same Way: Modeling Moral Judgment During Uncertainty

Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments

Computational processes of simultaneous learning of stochasticity and volatility in humans