Abstract:Solar radiation modification has been suggested as a backup option to reduce anthropogenic warming. Marine cloud brightening (MCB) and ocean albedo modification (OAM) are two proposed approaches to intentionally reflect sunlight back to space over oceanic regions. Using the NCAR Community Earth System Model, we compare climate response to MCB and OAM under the framework of fast adjustment and slow feedback. We implement MCB and OAM uniformly over the global ocean to offset CO2-induced warming. We find that to offset 3.3 K global mean warming from a doubling of CO2, diagnosed effective radiative forcing is -4.8 and -3.6 W m(-2) for OAM and MCB, respectively. Correspondingly, radiative forcing efficacy of OAM is about 70% of MCB. Fast climate adjustment differs in response to MCB and OAM forcing. MCB cools the lower atmosphere by reflecting sunlight from cloud, causing a reduction in sunlight absorption in the atmosphere. In contrast, OAM, by reflecting more sunlight from surface, increases shortwave heating of the lower atmosphere, leading to a decrease in low marine clouds and hence a positive cloudy-sky shortwave forcing that partly compensates the negative clear-sky shortwave forcing. The slow climate response and pattern of equilibrium climate change are similar between MCB and OAM. As for hydrological cycle, relative to the climate under a doubling of CO2, both MCB and OAM produce an increase in precipitation and runoff over tropical land. Plain Language Summary To counteract anthropogenic CO2-induced global warming, various climate intervention approaches have been proposed. Among them, two approaches intend to reflect more sunlight back to space over ocean. One is marine cloud brightening that involves enhancement of marine cloud albedo. The other is ocean albedo modification that involves enhancement of ocean surface albedo. This study uses an Earth system model to compare climate response to these two climate intervention approaches. In our simulations, both approaches are designed to offset global mean surface warming caused by a doubling of atmospheric CO2. For the same amount of global cooling, ocean albedo modification produces a much stronger negative radiative forcing, implying that the forcing efficacy is smaller than that of marine cloud brightening. Under fixed sea surface temperature, fast climate adjustments, including changes in cloud and precipitation, differ substantially between these two approaches. This is mainly because ocean albedo modification reflects more sunlight from ocean surface, heating the lower atmosphere, but marine cloud brightening reflects more sunlight from cloud, cooling the lower atmosphere. When the climate system reaches a new equilibrium state after the adjustment of the atmosphere and upper ocean, these two approaches produce similar pattern of climate change.

Robust comparison of climate models with observations using blended land air and ocean sea surface temperatures

Using Climate Model Simulations to Constrain Observations

Comparison of climate response to marine cloud brightening and ocean&#160;albedo modification: A model study

Planetary boundary layer depth in Global climate models induced biases in surface climatology

Systematic climate model biases in the large‐scale patterns of recent sea‐surface temperature and sea‐level pressure change

Climate More Responsive to Marine Cloud Brightening Than Ocean Albedo Modification: A Model Study

Understanding the bias in surface latent and sensible heat fluxes in contemporary AGCMs over tropical oceans

Assessment of inter-model variability and biases of the global water cycle in CMIP3 climate models

Attribution of Biases of Interhemispheric Temperature Contrast in CMIP6 Models

Why Must a Solar Forcing Be Larger Than a CO 2 Forcing to Cause the Same Global Mean Surface Temperature Change?

Understanding Models' Global Sea Surface Temperature Bias in Mean State: From CMIP5 to CMIP6

Coupled Climate Models Systematically Underestimate Radiation Response to Surface Warming

Exploiting large ensembles for a better yet simpler climate model evaluation

Evaluating Biases in Simulated Land Surface Albedo from Cmip5 Global Climate Models

Implications of a Pervasive Climate Model Bias for Low‐Cloud Feedback

An Analysis of Simulated Global Sea Ice Extent, Thickness, and Causes of Error with the BCC_CSM Model

Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales

Assessment of radiative feedback in climate models using satellite observations of annual flux variation

Comparison of Forecasting Biases Over New York State Mesonet: A Wet Summer Versus a Dry Summer

Benchmarking Coupled Climate‐carbon Models Against Long‐term Atmospheric CO2 Measurements

A Study of Biases in Simulation of the Indian Ocean Basin Mode and Its Capacitor Effect in CMIP3/CMIP5 Models