Planetary boundary layer depth in Global climate models induced biases in surface climatology

Richard Davy,Igor Ezau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.8426

2014-09-30

Abstract:The Earth has warmed in the last century with the most rapid warming occurring near the surface in the arctic. This enhanced surface warming in the Arctic is partly because the extra heat is trapped in a thin layer of air near the surface due to the persistent stable-stratification found in this region. The warming of the surface air due to the extra heat depends upon the amount of turbulent mixing in the atmosphere, which is described by the depth of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). In this way the depth of the ABL determines the effective response of the surface air temperature to perturbations in the climate forcing. The ABL depth can vary from tens of meters to a few kilometers which presents a challenge for global climate models which cannot resolve the shallower layers. Here we show that the uncertainties in the depth of the ABL can explain up to 60 percent of the difference between the simulated and observed surface air temperature trends and 50 percent of the difference in temperature variability for the Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) ensemble mean. Previously the difference between observed and modeled temperature was thought to be largely due to differences in individual models treatment of large-scale circulation and other factors related to the forcing, such as sea-ice extent. While this can be an important source of uncertainty in climate projections, our results show that it is the representation of the ABL in these models which is the main reason global climate models cannot reproduce the observed spatial and temporal pattern of climate change. This highlights the need for a better description of the stably-stratified ABL in global climate models in order to constrain the current uncertainty in climate variability and projections of climate change in the surface layer.

Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the bias present in Global Climate Models (GCMs) when simulating surface climate, particularly the relationship between these biases and the uncertainty in the depth of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL).

Specifically, the paper points out:

1. **Complexity of Surface Temperature Response**: The response of surface temperature to climate change depends not only on the intensity of climate forcing but also on the depth of the atmospheric boundary layer. The depth of the atmospheric boundary layer determines the effective response of near-surface air temperature to changes in climate forcing.

2. **Main Causes of Model Bias**: Previous studies have attributed the differences between models and observational data mainly to the different handling of large-scale circulation and other forcing factors (such as sea ice extent) by each model. However, this study shows that the main cause of these differences is the inaccurate description of the atmospheric boundary layer by the models, especially under stable stratification conditions.

3. **Challenges under Stable Stratification Conditions**: Under stable stratification conditions, the atmospheric boundary layer is very shallow, and global climate models struggle to accurately simulate this shallow boundary layer. This bias leads to an underestimation of surface temperature trends and variability by the models.

4. **Importance of Improving Models**: To reduce the uncertainty in current climate variability and future climate change predictions, it is necessary to improve the description of the stable stratified atmospheric boundary layer in global climate models.

Through these analyses, the paper emphasizes the importance of improving atmospheric boundary layer parameterization schemes, particularly in high-latitude regions and continental interiors, where strong surface temperature inversions frequently occur.