Why Must a Solar Forcing Be Larger Than a CO 2 Forcing to Cause the Same Global Mean Surface Temperature Change?

Angshuman Modak,Govindasamy Bala,Long Cao,Ken Caldeira
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044013
IF: 6.7
2016-01-01
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Many previous studies have shown that a solar forcingmust be greater than aCO2 forcing to cause the same globalmean surface temperature change but a process-basedmechanistic explanation is lacking in the literature. In this study, we investigate the physicalmechanisms responsible for the lower efficacy of solar forcing compared to an equivalent CO2 forcing. Radiative forcing is estimated using theGregorymethod that regresses top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiativeflux against the change in globalmean surface temperature. For a 2.25% increase in solar irradiance that produces the same long term globalmeanwarming as a doubling of CO2 concentration, we estimate that the efficacy of solar forcing is∼80% relative toCO2 forcing in theNCARCAM5 climatemodel.We find that the fast tropospheric cloud adjustments especially over land and stratospheric warming in the first fourmonths cause the slope of the regression between the TOAnet radiative fluxes and surface temperature to be steeper in the solar forcing case. This steeper slope indicates a stronger net negative feedback and hence correspondingly a larger solar forcing thanCO2 forcing for the same equilibrium surface warming. Evidence is provided that rapid land surface warming in the first fourmonths sets up a landsea contrast thatmarkedly affects radiative forcing and the climate feedback parameter over this period.We also confirm the robustness of our results using simulations from theHadleyCentre climatemodel. Our study has important implications for estimating themagnitude of climate change caused by volcanic eruptions, solar geoengineering and past climate changes caused by change in solar irradiance such asMaunderminimum.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?