Understanding the bias in surface latent and sensible heat fluxes in contemporary AGCMs over tropical oceans

Xin Zhou,Pallav Ray,Bradford S. Barrett,Pang-Chi Hsu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05431-y
IF: 4.901
2020-08-27
Climate Dynamics
Abstract:The performance of 20 models participating in the atmospheric model intercomparison project (AMIP) is evaluated concerning surface latent (<i>Q</i><sub><i>LH</i></sub>) and sensible (<i>Q</i><sub><i>SH</i></sub>) heat flux over the tropical oceans (30°S–30°N). Biases were calculated by comparing model fluxes to observations from moored buoys and the objectively analyzed air–sea fluxes (OAFlux) database. All 20 AMIP models overestimate <i>Q</i><sub><i>LH</i></sub> with an ensemble mean bias of 20 W m<sup>−2</sup>, and 18 of the 20 models overestimate <i>Q</i><sub><i>SH</i></sub> with an ensemble mean bias of 5 W m<sup>−2</sup> when compared to OAFlux, implying a systematic positive bias over the tropical oceans. A comparison with buoy observations also showed similar biases. To obtain insights into the causes behind model bias, we quantified the contribution from near-surface winds, specific humidity, and temperatures. It is found that near-surface humidity contributes more to the bias in <i>Q</i><sub><i>LH</i></sub> than wind speed, while air temperature contributes more to bias in <i>Q</i><sub><i>SH</i></sub> than wind speed. On the other hand, the root mean squared error (RMSE) in <i>Q</i><sub><i>LH</i></sub> has contributions from both near-surface humidity and wind. The contribution from humidity to the mean bias in <i>Q</i><sub><i>LH</i></sub> is 13 W m<sup>−2</sup>, with RMSE of 15 W m<sup>−2</sup>, suggesting a systematic overestimation of sea-air humidity difference in models. The model ensemble, in general, simulates <i>Q</i><sub><i>LH</i></sub> and <i>Q</i><sub><i>SH</i></sub> better than individual models. Models with higher horizontal and vertical resolutions perform better than coarse resolution models.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?