Abstract:This study highlights Indonesia’s strategy in response to the growing competition between the United States and China. In recent years, Indonesia under the administration of President Joko Widodo has played a strategic role in maintaining regional stability in the Indo-Pacific amid inflaming tensions between the two countries. On the basis of an “independent and active” foreign policy with Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) at the center of a concentric circle, Indonesia has employed a hedging strategy to bolster regional stability and foster cooperation among countries in the region. While there may be room for a hedging strategy, it is important to understand how Indonesia has employed this strategy to shape the regional order. This paper argues that Indonesia has adopted a double hedging strategy of economic pragmatism on the one hand and limited bandwagoning on the other. The former includes a deepening of economic cooperation with China through collaboration between Indonesia’s vision of a Global Maritime Fulcrum and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The latter includes keeping the US involved in the Indo-Pacific by proposing its Indo-Pacific concept to regional players without challenging the existing proposals offered by major powers. This paper consists of four sections. The first section introduces the theoretical basis by focusing on Indonesia’s foreign policy ideas as it deals with competition between great powers. The second section discusses the synthesis of Indonesia’s vision of a Global Maritime Fulcrum and concept of the Indo-Pacific. The third section demonstrates how Indonesia has employed its double hedging strategy. The fourth section highlights the conclusions of this study by summarizing Indonesia’s response to competition between the US and China and providing recommendations for further research.

The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Duterte’s Hedging Approach with China and the United States

Philippine hedging strategy from the perspective of neoclassical realism

The Limits of Intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ Changing Strategy in the South China Sea Dispute and Its Impact on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)

The Philippines’ Perception and Strategy for China’s Belt and Road Initiative Expansion: Hedging with Balancing

Challenging China’s Maritime Expansion in the South China Sea from the Aquino to the Duterte Administrations

That Ship Has Sailed: China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Marcos Administration

Indonesia’s South China Sea Policy: The Limits of Hedging

Interpreting Obama Administration's South China Sea Policy

Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications

ASEAN and the Major Powers in the South China Sea: the Role of Law, Diplomacy, and Deterrence in Moderating Sovereignty Claims

Japan’s Balanced Strategy to Face China’s Threat in South China Sea Dispute

Navigating the Indo-Pacific: Vietnam's Hedging Strategies Amid the Geopolitical Rivalry Between China and the United States

The South China Sea: ASEAN’s Security Concerns about China

The South China Sea International Disputes with the ASEAN Area (in International Maritime Law)

Indonesia’s Double Hedging Strategy toward the United States–China Competition: Shaping Regional Order in the Indo-Pacific?

The Reaction of Philippine Society to One Belt One Road Initiative

Questioning The Existence Of Asean Political Security Community In South China Sea Conflict

The Clash of Interests: Issues of the US Pivot to Asia and China’s Maritime Silk Road

The Biden Administration's South China Sea Policy from the Perspective of Indo-Pacific Strategy:Power, Rules, and Order

US-China global competition and dilemma for Vietnam's strategic choices in the South China Sea conflict

Small Power Hedging in an Era of Great-power Politics: Southeast Asian Responses to China’s Pursuit of Energy Security