Abstract:The article examines the specifics of the situation in Southeast Asia (Southeast Asia) from the point of view of military security issues and in connection with the situation in the Indo-Pacific region (ITR). The author proceeds from the fact that a serious destabilizing factor in the region remains the presence of intraregional contradictions - political, territorial and ethno-confessional, which are used by extra-regional actors under the auspices of the United States. Having identified China and Russia as the main rivals, Washington improved its Indo-Pacific strategy, activated the activities of existing ones and began to form new military-political alliances, on the basis of which it is envisaged to create an Asia-Pacific branch of NATO to contain them. The author believes that Washington's policy in Southeast Asia is opposed by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which proceeds from its central role in the evolution of the regional security architecture. In the context of the escalating rivalry between the United States and China, ASEAN sees a way to overcome the complex of regional contradictions in creating a security system based on mechanisms associated with ASEAN. In the ASEAN concept, the ITR appears as a region of dialogue and cooperation, not competition, open to China and other interested states to participate in the project. The author comes to the conclusion that such a statement of the question is justified both from the point of view of the strategic interests of the Southeast Asian countries themselves, and in general of the entire ITR. Analyzing the strategy adopted by Washington, the author believes that it becomes a long-term factor of strategic planning in the Pentagon. Its main goal will be to forcefully counter China's policy and put pressure on Russia and ASEAN, which seek to resist the dominance of the United States in the IT. In his opinion, in the current conditions of the situation, it is necessary to further strengthen the comprehensive strategic partnership between Russia and China and deepen cooperation with ASEAN on the basis of common interests in order to ensure regional security and stability.

The Clash of Interests: Issues of the US Pivot to Asia and China’s Maritime Silk Road

Analyzing United States Pivot to Asia and China’s Global Rebalancing through Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

Connotation and Dilemma of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Responses

The recalibration of Chinese assertiveness: China's responses to the Indo-Pacific challenge

Mainland China Debates U.S. Pivot/Rebalancing to Asia

An Onslaught Against China ' s Diplomacy and Security from the Obama Administration ' s Adjustments to its Asia-Pacific Strategy

The US Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy: Implications for China (2017-present)

Balance of power, balance of alignment, and China's role in the regional order transition

The Indo-Pacific: The Gauntlet Thrown Down by US, India, Japan and Australia to China’s Asia-Pacific Order

The 2020 turning point: Towards a new cold war or a new era of multipolarity?

The rise and fall of China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’: Implications for US-China geopolitical competition in the Indo-Pacific

China's Expanding Influence in the Asia-Pacific: Strategic Implications for the United States

The Impact of the China-US Competition in East Asia on the Security of the Asia-Pacific Region

China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative, Southeast Asia, and the United States

Southeast Asia in the context of the rivalry between the USA and China

Thinking Inertia and Path Dependence in Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States

The political economy of US maritime strategy in the Indo-Pacific

The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China-U.S. Strategic Competition

The Logical Contradictions of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response

Balancing China: Indo-US relations and convergence of their interests in the Indo-Pacific