Abstract:The U.S. and China are at it again, as naval and aerial interceptions in and around the South China Sea become a matter of disturbing routine. At the heart of the dispute stands the lingering question of whether customary international law as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) authorizes third State to engage in surveillance and military maneuvers in Coastal states EEZ without their consent. The answer lies in interpreting Article 58(1) of UNCLOS. This paper aims to respond to the calls put forward by States, scholars and research institutes to promote a legal compromise between permissive and prohibitive interpretive approaches to UNCLOS Art. 58(1). The traditional interpretation of the Article, and the EEZ Surveillance conundrum more broadly, has thus far been reviewed by scholars solely through the lenses of the age-old debate between Hugo Grotius and John Selden over Mare Liberum and Mare Clausum. In other words, existing scholarship treats the dispute as a binary zero-sum game. Following in the footsteps of Prof. Lissitzyn, the model proposed in the Article recognizes the freedom of navigation premise as an analytical starting point, but nonetheless introduces, for reasons of maintaining minimum order, a set of restraints ("necessity," "last resort," and "proportionality") to be internalized by third States' in deciding whether to launch intelligence operations in another coastal State’s EEZ. To develop these standards the paper examines the limits of a State's right to spy under international law and the effects that advancements of surveillance technology have had over our evolutionary interpretation of UNCLOS. The paper's nuanced approach thus treats the EEZ surveillance problem as a microcosm through which to examine meta- issues concerning the function intelligence plays in our public world order.

Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications

Deep Structures of the Palawan and Sulu Sea and Their Implications for Opening of the South China Sea

The Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Its Implications for China’s Regional Policy

ASEAN and the Major Powers in the South China Sea: the Role of Law, Diplomacy, and Deterrence in Moderating Sovereignty Claims

The East China Sea: A Case of Ocean Geopolitics and Maritime Conflict

China and Southeast Asia in the 2000s: Tension Management in the Maritime Space

The Law of the Sea and PRC Gray-Zone Operations in the South China Sea

The South China Sea: ASEAN’s Security Concerns about China

The Limits of Intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ Changing Strategy in the South China Sea Dispute and Its Impact on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)

China’s Maritime Ambition, Security Dilemma and Lack of Multilateral Framework

Status Quo and Lack of Dispute on South-sea Sovereignty between China and the Philippines in the Eye of International Law

Challenging China’s Maritime Expansion in the South China Sea from the Aquino to the Duterte Administrations

SEAPOWER AND SINO-JAPANESE RELATIONS IN THE EAST CHINA SEA

THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTE AS A THREAT TO ASEAN COOPERATIVE SECURITY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

The Dragon-Kings Restraint: Proposing a Compromise for the EEZ Surveillance Conundrum

Joint Development in the South China Sea: China’s Incentives and Policy Choices

The South China Sea International Disputes with the ASEAN Area (in International Maritime Law)

Questioning The Existence Of Asean Political Security Community In South China Sea Conflict

Small Power Hedging in an Era of Great-power Politics: Southeast Asian Responses to China’s Pursuit of Energy Security

Power Analysis and Geopolitical Codes of South China Sea States in the Context of Contemporary Geopolitics

International Law and Human Security: The Environmental and Geopolitical Impacts of China’s Artificial Island-Building at Fiery Cross Reef