Abstract:The Duterte administration has adopted a positive attitude toward China; however, Filipino people are cautious in cooperating with China because of Chinese behavior in the South China Sea dispute and the country's increasing influence on the world economy and regional security. The Filipino business sector's stance on this collaboration is closer to that of the government's because the BRI is perceived as a good business opportunity. Although there are diverging stances toward China and the BRI among state, people, and businesses in Philippines, these differences have not influenced President Duterte's decision to cooperate with China under the framework of the BRI. The Duterte administration shelved differences pertaining to the South China Sea dispute first and then participated in the Chinese government's BRI. Philippines' government has tried to combine China's funding and technology with Philippines' Build, Build, Build program to improve domestic infrastructure, expand export of agriculture products to China, and increase economic growth rate. The Duterte administration has thus expanded cooperation with China for benefits in terms of economy, trade, science and technology, agriculture, education, tourism, and infrastructure through the BRI. The implications of the above actions taken by Philippines' government include promotion of Philippines' economic and infrastructure developments and elimination of security threats from China without the United States' support through cooperation with China by participation in the BRI. Hence, shelving the South China Sea dispute is a means of promoting cooperation between the Philippines and China. The Duterte administration hopes to neutralize the effects of the pro-United States foreign policy in the past by cooperating with China in favor of maximum national interest.

Interpreting Obama Administration's South China Sea Policy

The Biden Administration's South China Sea Policy from the Perspective of Indo-Pacific Strategy:Power, Rules, and Order

The Latest Developments of the Us Freedom of Navigation Programs in the South China Sea: Deregulation or Re-Balance?

On the South China Sea Disputes in the Conflict of Sino-US Sea Power in the Post-Cold War Era

U.S.-Vietnam maritime security cooperation in the South China Sea: From the Obama administration to the current Biden administration

Exception to the Rule: the Obama Administration and China-Us Relations

An Onslaught Against China ' s Diplomacy and Security from the Obama Administration ' s Adjustments to its Asia-Pacific Strategy

The Obama Administration's Trade policy toward China and Sino-US Economic and Trade Relations

The Philippines’ Perception and Strategy for China’s Belt and Road Initiative Expansion: Hedging with Balancing

Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling

Challenging China’s Maritime Expansion in the South China Sea from the Aquino to the Duterte Administrations

The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and its Impacts on Asia-Pacific Order

The Diplomatic Games between China and US in South China Sea and Options for Its Solution

The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China-U.S. Strategic Competition

American Reflections on the Engagement with China and Responses to President Xi’s New Model of Major Power Relations

The Limits of Intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ Changing Strategy in the South China Sea Dispute and Its Impact on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)

The Biden Administration's Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Impact on China

The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Duterte’s Hedging Approach with China and the United States

China’s rights and interests in the South China Sea: challenges and policy responses

Historic Succession,Strategic Inter-construction and the South China Sea Policy---A Strategic Inquiry into the Indonesian Joko Widodo Administration’s Strategy of Maritime Power

U.S.Congress,Presidency,and China Policy:Changes,Debates and Agendas