Abstract:This paper presents an in‐depth analysis of the performance of large, medium‐sized, and small corporate takeovers involving Continental European and UK firms during the fifth takeover wave. We find that takeovers are expected to create takeover synergies as their announcements trigger statistically significant abnormal returns of 9.13% for the target and of 0.53% for bidding firms. The characteristics of the target and bidding firms and of the bid itself are able to explain a significant part of these returns: (i) deal hostility increases the target's but decreases bidder's returns; (ii) the private status of the target is associated with higher bidder's returns; and (iii) an equity payment leads to a decrease in both bidder's and target's returns. The takeover wealth effect is however not limited to the bid announcement day but is also visible prior and subsequent to the bid. The analysis of pre‐announcement returns reveals that hostile takeovers are largely anticipated and associated with a significant increase in the bidder's and target's share prices. Bidders that accumulate a toehold stake in the target experience higher post‐announcement returns. A comparison of the UK and Continental European M&A markets reveals that: (i) the takeover returns of UK targets substantially exceed those of Continental European firms. (ii) The presence of a large shareholder in the bidding firm has a significantly positive effect on takeover returns in the UK and a negative one in Continental Europe. (iii) Weak investor protection and low disclosure in Continental Europe allow bidding firms to adopt takeover strategies enabling them to act opportunistically towards the target's incumbent shareholders.

The role of governments in hostile takeovers – Evidence from regulation, anti-takeover provisions and government interventions

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting

Expropriation of Minority Shareholders in Politically Connected Firms

The Performance of the European Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from the Fifth Takeover Wave

Strategic responses to hostile takeover threats: Empirical evidence on enhancing corporate social engagement

Do Takeover Threats Suppress Corporate Willingness to Invest? Evidence from State Antitakeover Legislations

Reassessing the Rationales for the Takeover Bids Directives Board Neutrality Rule

Do Takeover Threats Deter Corporate Investment? Evidence from State Anti-takeover Legislations∗

Acquirers' political connections and bargaining outcomes in corporate takeover negotiations: Evidence from antitrust reviews

Anti-Takeover Provisions and Investment Timing

Takeover Bids and Target Directors' Incentives: Retention, Experience and Settling-Up

Corporate Governance Reforms and Cross-Border Acquisitions

Hostile Takeovers and Anti-takeover Defenses in the Russian Corporate Market

Tailwind and Headwind Bidding in German Takeover Offers – The Impact of Price Runups on Takeover Success

Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: the impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats

The impact of the EU takeover directive on takeover performance and empire building

The Government Intervention, the Nature of Ownership and Enterprises'Mergers & Acquisitions

Corporate Takeovers and Economic Efficiency

Why Do Firms in Weak Institutional Environments Adopt Strong Corporate Governance? The Role of Government Regulation

Managerial performance, boards of directors and takeover bidding