Investor Protection and Ownership Decentralization
Zhou Jie,Xiaopei Ding,Liyuan Han,Zhihui Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1569992
2010-01-01
Abstract:On the premise that the expropriation of corporate assets by controlling shareholders would generate a residual loss, we studied how the laws of investor protection influenced on the decentralization of corporate ownership and what role the litigation cost play in this story by continuous time finance model. There are several interested conclusions we reached. At first, the decentralization of ownership is the result of the effective legal protection of minority shareholders’ rights and interest, and this result is irrelevant to whether there is a litigation cost or who pays for this cost. Second, effective investor protection leads to lower private benefits of control. Third, our results demonstrated that an efficient investor protection system would evolve through a self-reinforcing pathway. This means that if the law can effectively protect the minority shareholders, then this protection will become increasingly strong. In contrast, if the investor protection system is ineffective, then this protection system will be practically dead in the end. Fourth, the conclusions about the judicial procedure of how to share the litigation cost means that if penalty remain unchanged, an effective investor protection would lead to the increase of litigation costs over time, while an ineffective investor protection would lead to a decrease over time. This result is independent of who will pay the cost. Finally, our results showed that if the minority shareholders within the legal timeliness of the investor protection law pay the litigation cost, an increase in the penalty rate would lead to an increase in litigation costs. The opposite result we obtain if the controlling shareholders pay the litigation cost; this will lead to a negative correlation between the penalty rate and litigation costs.