Abstract:There has been a growing body of crisis communication research that treats social media as a critical variable, which might alter how people perceive and react to crisis communication messages. The meta-analysis of 8 studies (k = 22, n = 3209, combined n = 9703) compared the impact of social media vs. traditional media in crisis communication. Five studies (n = 1896) contained 8 relevant effect sizes on crisis responsibility, representing 3294 individuals. Seven studies (n = 3185) contained 14 relevant effect sizes on persuasiveness, representing 6409 individuals. Compared to traditional media, using social media significantly lessened consumers' perceived crisis responsibility (r = -.134, 95 % CI -.212– -.054, p = .001). There was no significant difference between using traditional media and social media in crisis communication on persuasiveness (r = -.039, 95 % CI -.114– .035, p = .30). The moderator analysis indicated that for both crisis responsibility and persuasiveness, the effect size was more noticeable when an organization communicates with college students vs. non-student publics. The ability of social media in dampening crisis responsibility was more pronounced for fictitious organizations compared to real organizations. Compared to traditional media, social media was significantly more negative for preventable crisis, the influence was weak for accidental crisis. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, as well as directions for future research.

Media Frames and Crisis Events: Understanding the Impact on Corporate Reputations, Responsibility Attributions, and Negative Affect

To Blame is Human: A Quantitative Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Outcome Severity of Large‐Scale Crises and Attributions of Blame

Effect of violation of social missions on public attitude towards a social enterprise crisis: Mediation of causal attribution and moderation of medium and framing of online articles

Episodic and Thematic Framing Effects on the Attribution of Responsibility: The Effects of Personalized and Contextualized News on Perceptions of Individual and Political Responsibility for Causing the Economic Crisis

Does the medium matter? A meta-analysis on using social media vs. traditional media in crisis communication

Narrative persuasion, identification, attitudes, and trustworthiness in crisis communication

The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model

Do instructing and adjusting information make a difference in crisis responsibility attribution? Merging fear appeal studies with the defensive attribution hypothesis

When Things Go Wrong: Account Strategy Following a Corporate Crisis Event

The Impact of Corporate Strategies for Image Restoration on Consumer Trust in Crisis Events: the Moderating Role of Prosocial Motivation

When Blame-Giving Crisis Communications are Persuasive: A Dual-Influence Model and Its Boundary Conditions

An Examination of the Effects of Employee Words in Organizational Crisis: Public Forgiveness and Behavioral Intentions

A Study Media Coverage of College Crisis under Framing Theory

Convergence of crisis response strategy and source credibility: Who can you trust?

Does Being Socially Responsible Buffer Reputation Loss in a Product Crisis? the Moderating Role of Lay Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility

A Research Note Exploring Firm Action Announcements and Consumer Attributions of Blame: the Moderating Role of Base‐rate Information

Effects of Narratives, Openness to Dialogic Communication, and Credibility on Engagement in Crisis Communication Through Organizational Blogs

The role of empathy in crisis communication: Providing a deeper understanding of how organizational crises and crisis communication affect reputation

Risk‐reducing Strategies after a Product‐harm Crisis: the Moderating Role of Controllability Attribution

How Does Corporate Reputation Affect Customer Loyalty in a Corporate Crisis?

A Study Of Evaluating Media Agenda About Public Crises