Abstract:This study is the first to investigate how a local government’s humorously framed response strategy on social media to a low-severity crisis influences people’s trust in the local government and their crisis-related behavioral intentions, specifically when considering the government’s responsibility for the crisis. Based on the situational crisis communication theory, we examined the mediating role of experienced positive or negative affect on people’s responses to a local government’s crisis communication strategy. Further, we exploratorily examined the predictive power and moderating role of demographics, sense of humor, disposition to trust, and the respective crisis scenarios. A total of 517 people participated in an online experiment in which they were confronted with three randomly presented fictive crisis scenarios where the local government’s crisis responsibility (high versus low) and the framing of their crisis response strategy (in form of humorous versus rational Twitter posts) were systematically varied between subjects. First, the results mostly corroborate earlier findings about the degree of crisis responsibility (that is, when a government’s crisis responsibility is high, people have less trust and behavioral intentions) and about the mediating role of experienced affect. Second, we found that humorously framed strategies negatively influence trust and positive affect (but not behavioral intentions). In contrast to earlier findings, the crisis responsibility × framing interaction was not significant. Altogether, the results advise against using humor in crisis communications on social media, even in low-severity crisis. Exploratory analyses indicate that further investigations should focus on specific crisis characteristics and potential moderators.

Episodic and Thematic Framing Effects on the Attribution of Responsibility: The Effects of Personalized and Contextualized News on Perceptions of Individual and Political Responsibility for Causing the Economic Crisis

Framing Depression

Media Frames and Crisis Events: Understanding the Impact on Corporate Reputations, Responsibility Attributions, and Negative Affect

Passing the buck? Responsibility attribution and cognitive bias in multilevel democracies

Effects of Health Responsibility Frames on Attributions, Emotions, and Social Support Intentions in the Context of Dementias

Policy responsibility in the multilevel EU structure – The (non-)effect of media reporting on citizens’ responsibility attribution across four policy areas

How does fiscal austerity affect trust in the European Union? Analyzing the role of responsibility attribution

To Blame is Human: A Quantitative Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Outcome Severity of Large‐Scale Crises and Attributions of Blame

Free movement of blame? Examining blame attribution in EU economic crisis management using evidence from the 2013 Cypriot bank bail-in

Media Effects Across Time and Subject: How News Coverage Affects Two Out of Four Attributes of Consumer Confidence

Trust and accountability in times of crisis

The Impacts of Locus of Crisis Outcome Control on Responsibility Attribution in Hindsight: Focusing on Comparisons Between the American and Chinese Public

Upping the ante? The effects of “emergency” and “crisis” framing in climate change news

When company decisions harm or help the environment: the influence of social context and affective state on moral and causal responsibility attributions

Who is responsible? The impact of emotional personalization on explaining the origins of social problems

Motivated Reasoning and Blame: Responses to Performance Framing and Outgroup Triggers during COVID-19

Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions

Mediating the German Ideology: Ordoliberal Framing in European Press Coverage of the Eurozone Crisis

Asymmetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior

Is Being Funny a Useful Policy? How Local Governments’ Humorous Crisis Response Strategies and Crisis Responsibilities Influence Trust, Emotions, and Behavioral Intentions

Dynamics of COVID-19 blame attribution: A corpus-based analysis of readers’ comments in response to UK online news