Abstract:Actual causality and a closely related concept of responsibility attribution are central to accountable decision making. Actual causality focuses on specific outcomes and aims to identify decisions (actions) that were critical in realizing an outcome of interest. Responsibility attribution is complementary and aims to identify the extent to which decision makers (agents) are responsible for this outcome. In this paper, we study these concepts under a widely used framework for multi-agent sequential decision making under uncertainty: decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes (Dec-POMDPs). Following recent works in RL that show correspondence between POMDPs and Structural Causal Models (SCMs), we first establish a connection between Dec-POMDPs and SCMs. This connection enables us to utilize a language for describing actual causality from prior work and study existing definitions of actual causality in Dec-POMDPs. Given that some of the well-known definitions may lead to counter-intuitive actual causes, we introduce a novel definition that more explicitly accounts for causal dependencies between agents' actions. We then turn to responsibility attribution based on actual causality, where we argue that in ascribing responsibility to an agent it is important to consider both the number of actual causes in which the agent participates, as well as its ability to manipulate its own degree of responsibility. Motivated by these arguments we introduce a family of responsibility attribution methods that extends prior work, while accounting for the aforementioned considerations. Finally, through a simulation-based experiment, we compare different definitions of actual causality and responsibility attribution methods. The empirical results demonstrate the qualitative difference between the considered definitions of actual causality and their impact on attributed responsibility.

Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions

The importance of epistemic intentions in ascription of responsibility

Actual and counterfactual effort contribute to responsibility attributions in collaborative tasks

Asymmetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior

A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving.

Quantifying Responsibility with Probabilistic Causation -- The Case of Climate Action

Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration

Comparing third-party responsibility with intention attribution: An fMRI investigation of moral judgment

Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-Making

Actual Causality and Responsibility Attribution in Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes

The Catch-22 of Forgetfulness: Responsibility for Mental Mistakes

Insight into the process of responsibility judgment of an audit failure

Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology

Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame

When company decisions harm or help the environment: the influence of social context and affective state on moral and causal responsibility attributions

Towards Computationally Efficient Responsibility Attribution in Decentralized Partially Observable MDPs

How Likely Is it that I Would Act the Same Way: Modeling Moral Judgment During Uncertainty

Effects of Manipulation on Attributions of Causation, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

Degrees of individual and groupwise backward and forward responsibility in extensive-form games with ambiguity, and their application to social choice problems

Counterfactual simulation in causal cognition