Abstract:Actual causality and a closely related concept of responsibility attribution are central to accountable decision making. Actual causality focuses on specific outcomes and aims to identify decisions (actions) that were critical in realizing an outcome of interest. Responsibility attribution is complementary and aims to identify the extent to which decision makers (agents) are responsible for this outcome. In this paper, we study these concepts under a widely used framework for multi-agent sequential decision making under uncertainty: decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes (Dec-POMDPs). Following recent works in RL that show correspondence between POMDPs and Structural Causal Models (SCMs), we first establish a connection between Dec-POMDPs and SCMs. This connection enables us to utilize a language for describing actual causality from prior work and study existing definitions of actual causality in Dec-POMDPs. Given that some of the well-known definitions may lead to counter-intuitive actual causes, we introduce a novel definition that more explicitly accounts for causal dependencies between agents' actions. We then turn to responsibility attribution based on actual causality, where we argue that in ascribing responsibility to an agent it is important to consider both the number of actual causes in which the agent participates, as well as its ability to manipulate its own degree of responsibility. Motivated by these arguments we introduce a family of responsibility attribution methods that extends prior work, while accounting for the aforementioned considerations. Finally, through a simulation-based experiment, we compare different definitions of actual causality and responsibility attribution methods. The empirical results demonstrate the qualitative difference between the considered definitions of actual causality and their impact on attributed responsibility.

Actual and counterfactual effort contribute to responsibility attributions in collaborative tasks

Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions

Effects of Task Structure and Attribution Target on Responsibility Attributions in Human–robot Interaction

Interpersonal Attributions of Responsibility in the Chinese Workplace: A Test of Western Models in a Collectivistic Context1

The importance of epistemic intentions in ascription of responsibility

Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration

Asymmetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior

Actual Causality and Responsibility Attribution in Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes

The Catch-22 of Forgetfulness: Responsibility for Mental Mistakes

When Employees Fail in Chinese Enterprises: Attribution, Responsibility, and Constructive Criticism

On Blame Attribution for Accountable Multi-Agent Sequential Decision Making

Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame

What to Blame? Self-Serving Attribution Bias with Multi-Dimensional Uncertainty

Disappearance of Self-Serving Bias: Reward Positivity Reflects Performance Monitoring Modulated by Responsibility Attribution in a Two-Person Cooperative Task.

Effect of Relative Status on Responsibility Attributions in Human–robot Collaboration: Mediating Role of Sense of Responsibility and Moderating Role of Power Distance Orientation

Should I Blame the Human or the Robot? Attribution Within a Human–Robot Group

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

Insight into the process of responsibility judgment of an audit failure

The Neural Basis of Responsibility Attribution in Decision-Making.

Interpersonal coordination enhances brain-to-brain synchronization and influences responsibility attribution and reward allocation in social cooperation

When company decisions harm or help the environment: the influence of social context and affective state on moral and causal responsibility attributions