Abstract:Despite the widespread availability of artificial intelligence (AI) products and services, consumer evaluations and adoption intentions have not met expectations. Existing research mainly focuses on AI's instrumental attributes from the consumer perspective, along with negative impacts of AI failures on evaluations and willingness to use. However, research is lacking on AI as a collaborative agent, investigating the impact of human-AI collaboration on AI acceptance under different outcome expectations. This study examines the interactive effects of human-AI collaboration types (AI-dominant vs. AI-assisted) and outcome expectations (positive vs. negative) on AI product evaluations and usage willingness, along with the underlying mechanisms, from a human-AI relationship perspective. It also investigates the moderating role of algorithm transparency in these effects. Using three online experiments with analysis of variance and bootstrap methods, the study validates these interactive mechanisms, revealing the mediating role of attribution and moderating role of algorithm transparency. Experiment 1 confirms the interactive effects of human-AI collaboration types and outcome expectations on consumer evaluations and usage willingness. Under positive outcome expectations, consumers evaluate and express willingness to use AI-dominant intelligent vehicles with autonomous driving capabilities higher than those with emergency evasion capabilities (AI-assisted). However, under negative outcome expectations, consumers rate autonomous driving capabilities lower compared to emergency evasion capabilities. Experiment 2 examines the mediating role of attribution through ChatGPT's dominant or assisting role under different outcome expectations. Experiment 3 uses a clinical decision-making system to study algorithm transparency's moderating role, showing higher transparency improves evaluations and willingness to use AI products and services under negative outcome expectations. Theoretically, this study advances consumer behavior research by exploring the human-AI relationship within artificial intelligence, enhancing understanding of consumer acceptance variations. Practically, it offers insights for better integrating AI products and services into the market.

Effects of Task Structure and Attribution Target on Responsibility Attributions in Human–robot Interaction

Effect of Relative Status on Responsibility Attributions in Human–robot Collaboration: Mediating Role of Sense of Responsibility and Moderating Role of Power Distance Orientation

Should I Blame the Human or the Robot? Attribution Within a Human–Robot Group

The Fundamental Attribution Error in Human-Robot Interaction: An Experimental Investigation on Attributing Responsibility to a Social Robot for Its Pre-Programmed Behavior

Anthropomorphism-based causal and responsibility attributions to robots

Effect of Robot Tutor’s Feedback Valence and Attributional Style on Learners

Responses to Human and Robot Errors in Human‒Robot Collaboration: an Fnirs Study

Effects of morality and reputation on sharing behaviors in human-robot teams

Disappearance of Self-Serving Bias: Reward Positivity Reflects Performance Monitoring Modulated by Responsibility Attribution in a Two-Person Cooperative Task.

Actual and counterfactual effort contribute to responsibility attributions in collaborative tasks

Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration

The impact of human-AI collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribution

Blame Attribution Asymmetry in Human-Automation Cooperation.

The Neural Basis of Responsibility Attribution in Decision-Making.

The dynamics of human–robot trust attitude and behavior — Exploring the effects of anthropomorphism and type of failure

Asymmetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior

Sustainable Impact of Stance Attribution Design Cues for Robots on Human–Robot Relationships—Evidence from the ERSP

Effect of anthropomorphic design and hierarchical status on balancing self-serving bias: Accounting for education, ethnicity, and experience

Effects of Context, Assistance, and Communication on Beliefs About Cooperation in Human-Machine Teaming

Interpersonal Attributions of Responsibility in the Chinese Workplace: A Test of Western Models in a Collectivistic Context1

Effects of service robots' anthropomorphism on consumers' attribution toward and forgiveness of service failure