Free movement of blame? Examining blame attribution in EU economic crisis management using evidence from the 2013 Cypriot bank bail-in

AGNI POULLIKKA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qkacd
2022-02-17
Abstract:How do voters and politicians assign blame in relation to policy outcomes pertaining to the management of the Eurozone crisis? Recent research shows that in response to taxpayer-funded bailouts imposed by the European Union (EU) and the IMF (International Monetary Fund) voters in Southern Europe punished the incumbent government. I approach blame attribution in the context of the EU's multilevel institutional structure with respect to bail-in, a new crisis management tool which shifts the burden of the crisis onto bank creditors. Using a mixed-methods approach, I focus on the 2013 Cypriot economic crisis, during which a bank bail-in was implemented for the first time in the Eurozone. To measure voter attitudes, I design and analyse an original public opinion survey using logistic regression models. I find that the majority of voters assign blame to the central bank. Government partisanship, EU support and crisis exposure are predictors of blame attribution attitudes. Domestic political elite diffuse policy responsibility towards a number of actors, including the EU, as the examination of elite interviews, parliamentary speeches and press releases demonstrates. Considered in tandem, the voter and elite attitudes support the argument that the government does not get primary responsibility for the crisis, as blame is dispersed towards non-elected actors. The findings inform the blame attribution literature and carry policy implications for democratic accountability in the EU and the future of the banking union.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?