When Things Go Wrong: Account Strategy Following a Corporate Crisis Event

E Deanne Brocato,Robert A Peterson,Victoria L Crittenden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2011.24
2012-02-01
Corporate Reputation Review
Abstract:The CEO is often the ‘face’ of a corporation during a crisis event or transgression. However, the current research finds that the type of account strategy employed in a crisis communication – denial, justification, excuse or apology – has differential effects on stakeholder perceptions, as well as on impressions of the corporation and the CEO. Using an experimental research design and a scenario-based approach, the reactions of 796 study participants to four account strategy types offered by a CEO in response to a corporate crisis event were analyzed. Research results suggest that an apology or an excuse decreases negative impressions of the CEO, whereas a justification or denial decreases negative impressions of the corporation. Thus, a company and its CEO may be at odds when determining the appropriate account strategy to use following a corporate crisis event.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?