Abstract:Purpose Merely being known as a highly ethical or strong performer cannot shield a company from every kind of crisis. From product failures to environmental and social issues, a brand's ability to manage crises and rapidly regain consumer trust is essential. This study aims to explore whether consumer perceptions of a brands' prior commitments to two different areas of corporate responsibility (social and product responsibility) alleviate the postcrisis attribution of accountability and further build brand resilience, examining differences between two types of crisis situations – values versus performance crises. Design/methodology/approach A scenario-based online survey on product versus ethical labor issues was conducted. The data were collected from a highly valid, nationwide sample set of more than a thousand US consumers. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used as the primary data analysis method. Findings A brand's precrisis commitment to social responsibility was found to decrease attribution of accountability across both types of crises. It also strengthened brand resilience, but this effect was more prevalent in a performance than a values crisis. The effects of precrisis commitment to product responsibility on brand resilience were minimal or insignificant across crisis types. Originality/value Previous research underexplores which types of corporate responsibility commitments provide a firm with a better protection against crises. This study significantly advances the knowledge regarding the type of commitments that can substantially increase brand resilience, which supports the rationale of making stronger commitments to social responsibility than to product responsibility. Practical insights are provided into how investments in corporate social responsibility help alleviate consumers' negative perceptions during the outbreak of a brand crisis and build more brand muscle that enables resilience against future crises.

Responses Toward Corporate Crisis and Corporate Advertising

Corporate crisis advertising: A framework examining the use and effects of corporate advertising before and after crises

Examining native CSR advertising as a post-crisis response strategy

The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model

Surviving a Crisis: How Crisis Type and Psychological Distance Can Inform Corporate Crisis Responses

The Role of Corporate Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies in Data Breach Management.

When good becomes bad: the role of corporate crisis and issue congruence

Will consumers give us another chance to bounce back? Effects of precrisis commitments to social and product responsibility on brand resilience

The Effects of Brand Crisis on Consumer Negative Emotions: Focused on Crisis Causes and Brand Personality

When Things Go Wrong: Account Strategy Following a Corporate Crisis Event

Crisis-induced Public Demand for Regulatory Intervention in the Social Media Era: Examining the Moderating Roles of Perceived Government Controllability and Consumer Collective Efficacy

Exploring the Effects of Consumers’ Thinking Styles on Their Reactions to Corporate Strategic Response to a Brand Crisis

The interaction effect between brand identification and personal crisis relevance on consumers’ emotional reactions to a fashion brand crisis

The Value of Brand Fans during a Crisis: Exploring the Roles of Response Strategy, Source, and Brand Identification

Cross-cultural differences in concrete and abstract corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns: perceived message clarity and perceived CSR as mediators

When Connection Turns to Anger: How Consumer-Brand Relationship and Crisis Type Moderate Language on Social Media

An Examination of the Effects of Employee Words in Organizational Crisis: Public Forgiveness and Behavioral Intentions

Promoting corporate social responsibility message in COVID-19 advertising: How threat persuasion affects consumer responses to altruistic versus strategic CSR

The crisis‐response match: An empirical investigation

How Corporate Social Advocacy Affects Attitude Change Toward Controversial Social Issues

Corporate Social Advocacy as Public Interest Communications: Exploring Perceptions of Corporate Involvement in Controversial Social-Political Issues