Abstract:AbstractThe present research used behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERP) measures to determine whether emotional capture is automatic in the emotion-induced blindness (EIB) paradigm. The first experiment varied the priority of performing two concurrent tasks: identifying a negative or neutral picture appearing in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of pictures and multiple object tracking (MOT). Results showed that increased attention to the MOT task resulted in decreased accuracy for identifying both negative and neutral target pictures accompanied by decreases in the amplitude of the P3b component. In contrast, the early posterior negativity (EPN) component elicited by negative pictures was unaffected by variations in attention. Similarly, there was a decrement in MOT performance for dual-task vs. single task conditions but no effect of picture type (negative vs. neutral) on MOT accuracy which isn't consistent with automatic emotional capture of attention. However, the MOT task might simply be insensitive to brief interruptions of attention. The second experiment used a more sensitive reaction time (RT) measure to examine this possibility. Results showed that RT to discriminate a gap appearing in a tracked object was delayed by the simultaneous appearance of to-be-ignored distractor pictures even though MOT performance was once again unaffected by the distractor. Importantly, the RT delay was the same for both negative and neutral distractors suggesting that capture was driven by physical salience rather than emotional salience of the distractors. Despite this lack of emotional capture, the EPN component, which is thought to reflect emotional capture, was still present. We suggest that the EPN doesn't reflect capture but rather downstream effects of attention, including object recognition. These results show that capture by emotional pictures in EIB can be suppressed when attention is engaged in another difficult task. The results have important implications for understanding capture effects in EIB.

Perceptual, not memorial, disruption underlies emotion-induced blindness.

Gone for good: Lack of priming suggests early perceptual interference in emotion-induced blindness with negative stimuli.

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Awareness in Emotion-Induced Blindness

When Emotion Blinds: A Spatiotemporal Competition Account of Emotion-Induced Blindness

Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness

Opposite ERP Effects for Conscious and Unconscious Semantic Processing under Continuous Flash Suppression

Clarifying the effect of facial emotional expression on inattentional blindness

Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words

Affective stimuli capture attention regardless of categorical distinctiveness: An emotion-induced blindness study

Searching for emotional salience

Emotional capture during emotion-induced blindness is not automatic

Emotion Induced Blindness Is More Sensitive to Changes in Arousal As Compared to Valence of the Emotional Distractor

Accessing without remembering: memory consolidation of information at the focus of awareness is optional

Dissociating emotion-induced blindness and hypervision.

More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink

Sensitivity to visual features in inattentional blindness

Involuntary attention can modulate the disappearance in motion-induced blindness

Task-Irrelevant Blindsight and the Impact of Invisible Stimuli

Congruence with items held in visual working memory boosts invisible stimuli into awareness: Evidence from motion-induced blindness

Conditions of directed attention inhibit recognition performance for explicitly presented target-aligned irrelevant stimuli

Habituation to emotional distractors attenuates emotion-induced blindness.