Abstract:In the emotion induced blindness (EIB) paradigm, participants search for a single target picture embedded in a rapidly presented sequence of "background" pictures. When the sequence also contains a task-irrelevant, emotional distractor appearing shortly before the target, awareness for the target is severely impaired (Most, Chun, Widders, & Zald, 2005). This temporary "blindness" for the target is thought to reflect attention capture by the emotionally salient distractor which blocks the target's access to the attention system. However, there are also reasons to suspect that physical salience may play an important role in the initial attention capture process. The emotional pictures consist of close-ups of people and animals while the background pictures are wide-angle views of landscapes and cityscapes. These physical differences might result in pop-out of the distractor picture that is at least partially based on physical and not emotional salience. We investigated the role of physical salience in emotional capture by comparing the typical EIB paradigm, which uses dissimilar distractors, with one in which the background pictures consist of people and animals in non-emotional settings (similar distractors). If emotional salience is the basis of attention capture in EIB, we should see similar amounts of target suppression in both conditions. Instead, we found that the EIB effect was reduced and possibly eliminated in the similar background condition. A control experiment revealed that emotional information was still available in the similar background condition because the blink was restored when the emotional picture was designated for report by a salient cue. These findings are clearly inconsistent with current theories of EIB (e.g., McHugo, Olatunji, & Zald, 2013) which assume that initial attention capture is driven by emotional not physical salience.

Clarifying the effect of facial emotional expression on inattentional blindness

Semantic Satiation of Emotional Words Impedes Facial Expression Processing in Two Stages

Sad Facial Expressions Increase Choice Blindness

Emotional Modulation of the Attentional Blink is Awareness-Dependent

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Awareness in Emotion-Induced Blindness

Perceptual, not memorial, disruption underlies emotion-induced blindness.

Beauty Hinders Attention Switch In Change Detection: The Role Of Facial Attractiveness And Distinctiveness

The influence of selective attention to specific emotions on the processing of faces as revealed by event-related brain potentials.

Attention Modulates Neural Responses to Unpredictable Emotional Faces in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Searching for emotional salience

Prioritized Identification of Fearful Eyes During the Attentional Blink is Not Automatic.

Weaker inhibition after happy faces: evidence from an attentional blink task with emotional and neutral faces

When Emotion Blinds: A Spatiotemporal Competition Account of Emotion-Induced Blindness

Out of Focus: Facial Feedback Manipulation Modulates Automatic Processing of Unattended Emotional Faces

How does facial feedback modulate emotional experience?

Gone for good: Lack of priming suggests early perceptual interference in emotion-induced blindness with negative stimuli.

Processing of Emotions Expressed Through Eye Regions Attenuates Attentional Blink.

Effect of distracting faces on visual selective attention in the monkey

Effects of Delay on Recognition of Happy and Angry Faces

Invisible fearful face induced by crowding can capture spatial attention

Valence resolution of ambiguous facial expressions using an emotional oddball task.