Sensitivity to visual features in inattentional blindness

Makaela Nartker,Chaz Firestone,Howard Egeth,Ian Phillips
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.18.593967
2024-06-08
Abstract:The relation between attention, perception and awareness is among the most fundamental problems in the science of the mind. One of the most striking and well-known phenomena bearing on this question is inattentional blindness (IB; Neisser & Becklen, 1975; Mack & Rock, 1998; Most et al., 2001, 2005). In IB, naive observers fail to report clearly visible stimuli when their attention is otherwise engaged -- famously even missing a gorilla parading before their eyes (Simons & Chabris, 1999). This phenomenon and the research programs it has motivated carry tremendous theoretical significance, both as crucial evidence that awareness requires attention (Cohen et al., 2012; Prinz, 2012; Noah & Mangun, 2020) and as a key tool in seeking the neural correlates of consciousness (Rees et al., 1999; Pitts et al., 2014; Hutchinson, 2019). However, these and other implications critically rest on a notoriously biased measure: asking participants whether they noticed anything unusual (and interpreting negative answers as reflecting a complete lack of visual awareness). Here, in the largest ever set of IB studies, we show that inattentionally blind participants can successfully report the location, color and shape of the stimuli they deny noticing. This residual visual sensitivity shows that perceptual information remains accessible in IB. We further show that subjective reports in IB are conservative, by introducing absent trials where no IB stimulus is presented; this approach allows us to show for the first time that observers are systematically biased to report not noticing in IB -- essentially 'playing it safe' in reporting their sensitivity. This pair of results is consistent with an alternative hypothesis about IB, namely that subjects retain awareness of stimuli they fail to report. Overall, these data provide the strongest evidence to date of significant residual visual sensitivity in IB, and even cast doubt on claims that awareness requires attention.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to visual sensitivity and the accuracy of awareness reports in inattentional blindness (IB). Specifically, the paper aims to explore whether, in the case of inattentional blindness, participants are truly completely lacking in perception of unattended stimuli, or whether they actually retain a certain degree of visual sensitivity but are too conservative in reporting, resulting in failure to report the existence of these stimuli. ### Background of the paper and problems - **Inattentional blindness (IB) phenomenon**: When people are focused on a task, they may overlook obvious but irrelevant stimuli, even if these stimuli appear directly in their field of vision. For example, when watching a basketball game, someone may not notice a passing gorilla. - **Limitations of existing research**: Most current research relies on simple "yes/no" questions to assess whether participants notice unexpected stimuli. This assessment method may be biased because participants may choose "no" out of caution or uncertainty, even if they have some perception of the stimuli. - **Research purpose**: Through an improved research design, explore whether participants can still report the location, color, and shape of unattended stimuli in the case of inattentional blindness, thereby verifying whether they are truly completely unaware of these stimuli or are just too conservative in reporting. ### Main findings - **Existence of visual sensitivity**: The study found that even when participants reported not noticing unexpected stimuli in traditional "yes/no" questions, they were still able to report certain characteristics of these stimuli (such as location, color, and shape) with an accuracy rate higher than chance. - **Conservatism in reporting**: By introducing "absent trials" (i.e., trials in which unexpected stimuli are not presented), the study found that participants tend to be conservative when reporting whether they noticed unexpected stimuli, that is, they tend to report "no". - **High - confidence non - noticers**: Even those participants who very confidently reported not noticing unexpected stimuli also showed a sensitivity higher than chance, which further supports the view that they still retain a certain degree of perception ability in the case of inattentional blindness. ### Conclusion The paper provides strong evidence that in the case of inattentional blindness, participants are not completely lacking in perception of unexpected stimuli, but there is significant residual visual sensitivity. This finding challenges the traditional view that attention is a necessary condition for conscious perception and proposes a new hypothesis that attention may only affect the degree of conscious perception, rather than completely determining its existence or non - existence.