Abstract:One driving factor for attention deployment towards a stimulus is its associated value due to previous experience and learning history. Previous visual search studies found that when looking for a target, distractors associated with higher reward produce more interference (e.g., longer response times). The present study investigated the neural mechanism of such value-driven attention deployment. Specifically, we were interested in which of the three attention sub-processes are responsible for the interference that was repeatedly observed behaviorally: enhancement of relevant information, attentional capture by irrelevant information, or suppression of irrelevant information. We replicated earlier findings showing longer response times and lower accuracy when a target competed with a high-reward compared to a low-reward distractor. We also found a spatial gradient of interference: behavioral performance dropped with increasing proximity to the target. This gradient was steeper for high- than low-reward distractors. Event-related potentials of the EEG signal showed the reason for the reward-induced attentional bias: High-reward distractors required more suppression than low-reward distractors as evident in larger Pd components. This effect was only found for distractors near targets, showing the additional filtering needs required for competing stimuli in close proximity. As a result, fewer attentional resources can be distributed to the target when it competes with a high-reward distractor, as evident in a smaller target-N2pc amplitude. The distractor-N2pc, indicative of attentional capture, was neither affected by distance nor reward, showing that attentional capture alone cannot explain interference by stimuli of high value. In sum our results show that the higher need for suppression of high-value stimuli contributes to reward-modulated attention deployment and increased suppression can prevent attentional capture of high-value stimuli.

Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness

Neural Suppression of Distractors Surrounding the Spotlight: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Awareness in Emotion-Induced Blindness

When Emotion Blinds: A Spatiotemporal Competition Account of Emotion-Induced Blindness

Perceptual, not memorial, disruption underlies emotion-induced blindness.

Sustained training with novel distractors attenuates the behavioral interference of emotional pictures but does not affect the electrocortical markers of emotional processing

Emotional Distractors Capture Attention even at Very Low Contrast Levels: ERP evidence

Emotion regulation meets emotional attention: The influence of emotion suppression on emotional attention depends on the nature of the distracters.

Affective stimuli capture attention regardless of categorical distinctiveness: An emotion-induced blindness study

Gone for good: Lack of priming suggests early perceptual interference in emotion-induced blindness with negative stimuli.

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Habituation to emotional distractors attenuates emotion-induced blindness.

Dynamic suppression of likely distractor locations: Task-critical modulation

Hearing fearful prosody impairs visual working memory maintenance

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Neural mechanisms for secondary suppression of emotional distractors: Evidence from concurrent electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography data

Visual Short-Term Memory Load Modulates the Early Attention and Perception of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Faces

Perceptual target discriminability modulates the Simon effect beyond the fading of distractor-based activation: Insights from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.

Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task.

Interference of Illusory Contour Perception by a Distractor

Attentional suppression of dynamic versus static salient distractors