Abstract:Through experiencing and reviewing multiple-country endeavors in academic profession study and participating in a new project regarding the academic profession in Asia, the author pinpoints and anticipates the shortcomings of study alone or dominantly questionnaire-based and ignoring the broader social context. The author proposes a new perspective or methodology to mitigate these shortcomings. The traditional approach focuses on commonalities rather than differences of the academic profession in a variety of countries. By comparing identical questionnaires, it is easy to conclude that, according to some indicators, the academic profession in developing countries, a category in which most Asian countries belong, is inferior to that in developed countries by a certain magnitude. This research strategy will devalue the research efforts on the academic profession in Asia. The academic profession is a complicated phenomenon, and it requires a sophisticated research methodology. The characteristics of the academic profession in Asia can be induced by empirically studying its relationship with the institutional environments in which the academic profession is embedded. In addition, all developing countries in Asia are undergoing a process of modernization. This dynamic feature is valuable and deserves exploration. The institutional environments in Asia can be demonstrated and illustrated via cultural and historical lenses. The purpose of this paper is to review international projects and literature regarding the academic profession. This review tries to be both critical and constructive, and shed light on newly initiated projects in the Asian academic profession. Two major research questions are raised by the author: What is the scholarly value of the new project? What strategy can researchers employ for this endeavor? Past research is dominated by the structure-function paradigm and cross-sectional questionnaire method. This approach has both strengths and weaknesses. Historical and cultural perspectives are proposed to overcome the Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Studying the Academic Profession 199 existing limitations and explore the potential value of the new academic effort.

The intimacies of cultural studies and area studies: The case of Southeast Asia

The problem with areas: Asia and Area studies

DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION Culture, Regionalism and Southeast Asian Identity

The spectre of Europe: Knowledge, cultural studies and the ‘rise of Asia’

Southeast Asian Culture and Heritage in a Globalising World: Diverging Identities in a Dynamic Region

Socio-cultural and Educational Cooperation between the EU and Asia

On the Relationship between Culture and International Relations Studies

‘After’ area studies? Place-based knowledge for our time

Unity-in-Diversity?: Regional Identity-building in Southeast Asia

The Southeast and the Southwest:Searching for the connections between "academic regions"

Boundary Work, Overlapping Identities, and Liminality in Communities of Practice: Diplomacy within and beyond ASEAN

The Rise of Area Studies in American Sinology

Southeast Asia and Interregionalism: A Historical Perspective

The Challenge of Cultural Diversity in Regional Integration: A Comparative Analysis of the EU and ASEAN

Island studies and socio-economic development policies in East Asia

Travelling songs: Heritage and popular culture in contemporary ASEAN

Cultural Studies in Interhemispherical Perspective. China, Africa, Asia and Australasia

The Same Term but Different Connotations: Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Studying the Academic Profession in China and Other Asian Countries

The im/possibilities of Caribbean area studies

Comparative education as a field in Asia: retrospect and prospect

Cultural Diplomacy and Co-operation in ASEAN: The Role of Arts and Culture Festivals