The Southeast and the Southwest:Searching for the connections between "academic regions"

Wang Mingming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2008.04.002
2008-01-01
Abstract:This article examines two existing "academic regions" in Chinese anthropology:the Southeastern and Southwestern models of anthropology.The author points out that the "bifurcation" of Southeastern "complex"of communities,lineages,markets,and folk religions and Southwestern "ways of being ethnic"has created a serious problem for the anthropology of Chinese civilization.He also argues that to further "internal understandings"of either region,it is necessary to think "externally" — to bring "external relationships" into "internal structures".The author has written extensively on sinological anthropology and ethnology as well as Chinese social science in general.In this context,he criticizes anthropologies in China and abroad of their common negligence of the relationships which have played important roles in the configuration of the regions under the empire-turned nation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?