Abstract:Abstract The human rights of foreign workers in global supply chains are routinely violated, yet the problem so far has largely evaded a legal solution. Economic analysis shows why domestic tort liability can partially address this problem. Many consumers in developed countries have a lower willingness-to-pay for products produced by global supply chains that systemically subject foreign workers to egregiously dangerous working conditions in gross violation of their human rights. This attribute of consumer demand provides a basis for subjecting the domestic chain leader to domestic tort liability for the bodily injuries suffered by these foreign workers, including those employed by independent suppliers. Chain leaders, like other product sellers, are obligated to warn about foreseeable safety risks that are not known by consumers and would be material to their decision about whether to purchase or use a product. The tort duty also requires sellers to instruct consumers about the ways in which the purchase or use of the product might foreseeably harm third parties. A domestic seller that is the chain leader of a global supply chain would breach this duty by not warning domestic consumers that the product is produced by foreign workers who are systemically subjected to working conditions that are so unsafe as to amount to a gross violation of their human rights. Because the purchase of the product foreseeably exposes foreign workers to this ongoing risk of physical harm, they are protected by the tort duty and can recover for its breach. Causation can be established by the logic of the breached tort duty. If consumers had been warned that the product is produced in such a systemically unsafe work environment, a substantial number of them would not have purchased it – they would instead have purchased the same product at the higher price necessary to protect the foreign workers from these ongoing safety violations. By distorting consumer demand in this manner, the domestic product seller’s failure to warn domestic consumers of these human rights violations in the global supply chain proximately caused injury to these foreign workers, entitling them to compensation. By remedying these human rights violations, domestic chain leaders would satisfy the reasonable expectations of domestic consumers who have altruistic preferences to rescue foreign workers from extreme dangers within the production process. Tort law cannot redress the full range of human rights violations in global supply chains, but consumer demand provides a sound basis for tort liability that addresses a limited, though important component of the problem.

Foreign Direct Liability of Multinational Corporations in the Dutch Legal Order

DUAL ATTRIBUTION OF ACTS COMMITTED BY A UN PEACEKEEPING FORCE: AN EMERGING NORM OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW? THE DUTCH SUPREME COURT’S JUDGMENTS IN NUHANOVIÇ AND MUSTAFIĆ

Liability of Multinational Corporations in Canada for International Human Rights Violations

Private international law and substantive liability issues in tort litigation against multinational companies in the English courts: recent UK Supreme Court decisions and post-Brexit implications

The Shell Nigeria Judgments by the Court of Appeal of the Hague, a Breakthrough in the Field of International Environmental Damage? UK Law and Dutch Law on Parental Liability Compared

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

Parental Liability for Externalities of Subsidiaries: Domestic and Extraterritorial Approaches

The Duty of Care of Individuals for ghg Emissions under Dutch Tort Law

Explaining and Evaluating Transnational Tortious Actions against Parent Companies: Lessons from Shell and Nigeria

Development Of Maritime Limitation Of Liability In China (1993-2011)

Quo Vadis Corporate Crime Liability: Beyond Rule Reform and Future Prospect on Amending Criminal Code in Indonesia

The Dutch Real Rights can be the Basis of International Interests under the Convention of Cape Town, just like their equivalent American Security Interests.

Foreign corporate accountability: The contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany

Labyrinth of Choices in Respect of International Tax Dispute Resolution from a Netherlands Perspective

Corporate criminal liability and the identification principle: a critical and comparative analysis across Mauritius, US, UK and Canada

Legal Policy and Model of Criminal Responsibility in the Crime of Smuggling by Corporations in Indonesia

30% Women on Boards: New Law in the Netherlands (2012)

The Law and Economics of Tort Liability for Human Rights Violations in Global Supply Chains

Acts against Civil Law versus Acts Against Criminal Law Versus Rechtsvinding HogeRaad/Supreme Court Judge

Unpacking liability of foreignness: identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary

State responsibility for omissions : establishing a breach of the full protection and security obligation by omissions