Abstract:Abstract The human rights of foreign workers in global supply chains are routinely violated, yet the problem so far has largely evaded a legal solution. Economic analysis shows why domestic tort liability can partially address this problem. Many consumers in developed countries have a lower willingness-to-pay for products produced by global supply chains that systemically subject foreign workers to egregiously dangerous working conditions in gross violation of their human rights. This attribute of consumer demand provides a basis for subjecting the domestic chain leader to domestic tort liability for the bodily injuries suffered by these foreign workers, including those employed by independent suppliers. Chain leaders, like other product sellers, are obligated to warn about foreseeable safety risks that are not known by consumers and would be material to their decision about whether to purchase or use a product. The tort duty also requires sellers to instruct consumers about the ways in which the purchase or use of the product might foreseeably harm third parties. A domestic seller that is the chain leader of a global supply chain would breach this duty by not warning domestic consumers that the product is produced by foreign workers who are systemically subjected to working conditions that are so unsafe as to amount to a gross violation of their human rights. Because the purchase of the product foreseeably exposes foreign workers to this ongoing risk of physical harm, they are protected by the tort duty and can recover for its breach. Causation can be established by the logic of the breached tort duty. If consumers had been warned that the product is produced in such a systemically unsafe work environment, a substantial number of them would not have purchased it – they would instead have purchased the same product at the higher price necessary to protect the foreign workers from these ongoing safety violations. By distorting consumer demand in this manner, the domestic product seller’s failure to warn domestic consumers of these human rights violations in the global supply chain proximately caused injury to these foreign workers, entitling them to compensation. By remedying these human rights violations, domestic chain leaders would satisfy the reasonable expectations of domestic consumers who have altruistic preferences to rescue foreign workers from extreme dangers within the production process. Tort law cannot redress the full range of human rights violations in global supply chains, but consumer demand provides a sound basis for tort liability that addresses a limited, though important component of the problem.

Explaining and Evaluating Transnational Tortious Actions against Parent Companies: Lessons from Shell and Nigeria

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

Private international law and substantive liability issues in tort litigation against multinational companies in the English courts: recent UK Supreme Court decisions and post-Brexit implications

Parental Liability for Externalities of Subsidiaries: Domestic and Extraterritorial Approaches

The Shell Nigeria Judgments by the Court of Appeal of the Hague, a Breakthrough in the Field of International Environmental Damage? UK Law and Dutch Law on Parental Liability Compared

Foreign Direct Liability of Multinational Corporations in the Dutch Legal Order

Parent-Subsidiary Responsibility in the Development of Multinational Enterprises

Why Are Corporate Investment Horizons Shrinking? Uncovering the Spillover Effects of Shareholder Litigation

The Law and Economics of Tort Liability for Human Rights Violations in Global Supply Chains

Climate change on the board: navigating directors' duties

Litigation Risk and Corporate Social Responsibility—Evidence from a Poverty Alleviation Campaign in China

Liability of Multinational Corporations in Canada for International Human Rights Violations

Setting Limits on Corporate Nationality Planning in Investment Treaty Arbitration

Unpacking liability of foreignness: identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary

The Case Against a Special Regime for Intragroup Transactions

Corporate criminal liability and the identification principle: a critical and comparative analysis across Mauritius, US, UK and Canada

Corporate Culture and Systems Intentionality: part of the regulator's essential toolkit

From domestic to global? Recent trends in environmental liability from a multilevel and comparative law perspective

Human Rights in an Era of Neoliberal Globalization: The Alien Tort Claims Act and Grassroots Mobilization in Doe v. Unocal

Corporate Crimes in International Anti-Corruption Treaties: on Corporate Crimes and Liability Model in International Criminal Law

Can corporate social responsibility mitigate the liability of newness? Evidence from China