Abstract:Recent case law in the UK courts has established the possibility for the parent companies of multinational corporations (MNCs) to hold liability in tort negligence for harms caused by their foreign-based subsidiaries. The UK’s approach – a general duty of care for cross-border torts – is noteworthy in that it has developed organically through the common law despite conflicting with established principles of company law. By comparison, European neighbours such as France, Switzerland and Germany have developed statutory regulatory regimes which utilize due diligence obligations that appear more reflective of recent international accountability standards, such as the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) of the late John Ruggie. This work serves as an in-depth investigation for scholars of tort law, company law, private international law and human rights, who are interested in understanding this rapidly developing area of practice from an English perspective. This work is offered in two parts. This first part contextualizes the current law within contemporary academic discourse and offers a historically informed explanation for the conceptual underpinnings of the unique approach currently taken within English jurisprudence and their coherence with the broader principles of domestic UK company law. The second part offers an analysis of UK law as it stands including the caselaw that builds the corpus of parent company liability in England and Wales. It analyses how effective the current liabilities identified by the Courts are in securing fair remedy for corporate misfeasance. It identifies and categorizes its key features and contrasts them with comparative elements of statutory due diligence approaches adopted by France and Germany or pursued as in the case of Switzerland. It will finally consider whether they offer any concepts worthy of consideration for the regulation of parent company liabilities in future. Parent Company, Corporate Groups, English Company Law, Human Rights Due Diligence, UNGPs, Okpabi, Vedanta, Mass Torts, Supply Chain Liability, Limited Liability

Parental Liability for Externalities of Subsidiaries: Domestic and Extraterritorial Approaches

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

Parent-Subsidiary Responsibility in the Development of Multinational Enterprises

Private international law and substantive liability issues in tort litigation against multinational companies in the English courts: recent UK Supreme Court decisions and post-Brexit implications

From domestic to global? Recent trends in environmental liability from a multilevel and comparative law perspective

Explaining and Evaluating Transnational Tortious Actions against Parent Companies: Lessons from Shell and Nigeria

Unpacking liability of foreignness: identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary

Foreign Direct Liability of Multinational Corporations in the Dutch Legal Order

Regulatory Liability of Foreignness: Enforcement Against Foreign Banks in the United States

Promoting Corporate Extraterritorial Sustainable Responsibility through the Lens of Social Licence to Operate

Dual liability and the moderating effect of corporate social responsibility–Evidence from Belt&Road investment of Chinese firms

Retroactive Liability in China's Soil Pollution Law: Lessons from Theoretical and Comparative Analysis

Subsidiary Capital Structure in Multinational Enterprises: A New Internalization Theory Perspective

Do indigenous firms incur a liability of localness when operating in their home market? The case of China

Like Parent, Like Child: MNCs’ CSR and Their Foreign Subsidiaries’ Environmental Footprint

Corporate Compliance Capability of EMNEs: a Prerequisite for Overcoming the Liability of Emergingness in Advanced Economies

The Swiss Responsible Business Initiative and the Counter-Proposal

The Multifaceted Ownership Change of Foreign Subsidiaries: the Diverse Responses to Different Types of Negative Performance Feedback

Environmental Risk: A Comparative Law and Economics Approach to Liability and Insurance

A Study On The Liability Of Transnational Environmental Harm

Research on Tortious Liability of Third-party Treatment of Environmental Pollution in Mode of Enterprise-enterprise Cooperation