Abstract:The base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project and the creation of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS are ambitious initiatives that could transform the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) from a rich-countries club into the standard setter and a consensus facilitator on matters of global tax governance. In some areas, where the interests of many states have aligned, this transformation has already occurred. However, in highly disputed areas, such as the taxation of business profits in the digital economy or other distributive concerns, the OECD can only rely on shared values, which, if not entirely reconciling the conflicting interests of states, could at least encourage collective action. Since fairness underlies many common values, fairness-based narratives are a plausible source of soft power for the OECD and potentially a tool in facilitating tax cooperation. This article argues that this may be one possible explanation for the OECD's reliance on the concept of fairness in its BEPS documentation. Using the OECD's BEPS action 1 narrative as a case study and focusing on the social dimension of fairness, this article finds that this narrative is inconsistent with the states' narratives and is unjustified; it lacks fidelity (story integrity) and is only weakly persuasive, at least where the fairness argument is concerned. These flaws may not affect the OECD's legitimacy as a standard setter and consensus facilitator, but they may undermine the legitimacy of the OECD standards that are founded on fairness arguments, especially if those standards affect the distribution of the benefits and costs of tax cooperation.

The OECD as Pivot of the Emerging Global Educational Accountability Regime: How Accountable are the Accountants?

The Impact of the OECD on Education Worldwide

Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and the OECD PISA Global Competence Framework

Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the OECD’s PISA for Schools

PISA, global reference societies, and policy borrowing: The promises and pitfalls of ‘academic resilience’

Improving schooling through effective governance? The United States, Canada, South Korea, and Singapore in the struggle for PISA scores

Provincializing the OECD-PISA global competences project

Providing a platform for ‘what works’: platform-based governance and the reshaping of teacher learning through the OECD’s PISA4U

Locating inclusion within the OECD’s assessment of global competence: An inclusive future through PISA 2018?

The influence of the Programme for International Student Assessment on educational governance situated in the institutional setting of South Korea

Comparative international testing of early childhood education: The democratic deficit and the case of Portugal

Global competence in PISA 2018: deconstruction of the measure

Neoliberalism, neoconservativism, and globalisation: The OECD and new images of what is ‘best’ in early childhood education

The OECD and IELS: Redefining early childhood education for the 21st century

Editorial: Opening for debate and contestation: OECD’s International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study and the testing of children’s learning outcomes

The Legitimizing Effects of the OECD's Fairness-Based Narratives

Governance of early childhood education and care: recent developments in OECD countries

The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate

Accountability, social justice and educational research

The Moderating Effect of Gender Equality and Other Factors on PISA and Education Policy

The Marginalization of Aesthetic Education in the School Curriculum