Abstract:Purpose: This study analyzes the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data, revealing that the test itself reflects China’s educational problems as well as the resultant effect of digital governance. Examining the root cause of these problems, this study demonstrates that the education reforms implemented in response to the PISA have gone beyond digital governance. Design/Approach/Methods: This study conducts a text analysis of materials related to China’s education system, including PISA data and analytical reports published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development since 2009. Findings: Reflected by PISA data, the main problems facing China’s educational sector include the overburdening of students at school, emphasis on knowledge acquisition during the teaching process, and the prevalence of extracurricular tuition. The digital governance effect triggered by PISA is highly consistent with China’s constant and excessive pursuit of efficiency, emphasis on scores, and the rate of students entering higher level schools. In the new era, China actively reflected on the disadvantages of digital governance before implementing a series of education reforms that go beyond it. Originality/Value: This study is based on China’s cultural background and the latest contexts. It examines the impact of the large-scale international assessment on China’s education governance and discusses the impact of digital governance on the education reforms in other countries. The implementation of China’s post-PISA education reforms demonstrates that different countries can implement rational education reforms based on their own cultural traditions and social realities as well as by referencing and using PISA data with care and prudence.

Improving schooling through effective governance? The United States, Canada, South Korea, and Singapore in the struggle for PISA scores

Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the OECD’s PISA for Schools

The influence of the Programme for International Student Assessment on educational governance situated in the institutional setting of South Korea

Socioeconomic Status, Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment and Inequality: an Analysis Based on PISA2018 Results of China, Finland, South Korea and Singapore

The OECD as Pivot of the Emerging Global Educational Accountability Regime: How Accountable are the Accountants?

Post-PISA Education Reforms in China: Policy Response Beyond the Digital Governance of PISA

PISA, global reference societies, and policy borrowing: The promises and pitfalls of ‘academic resilience’

The Moderating Effect of Gender Equality and Other Factors on PISA and Education Policy

Constructing underachievement: the discursive life of Singapore in US federal education policy

SES-Achievement Gaps in East Asia: Evidence from PISA 2003–2018

What Key Contextual Factors Contribute to Students’ Reading Literacy among Top-Performing Countries and Economies? Statistical and Machine Learning Analyses

Teaching strategies and differential effectiveness across learning contexts: Evidence from PISA 2012

Singapore's School Excellence Model and Student Learning: Evidence from PISA 2012 and TALIS 2013

USING A MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO EXPLORE NON-COGNITIVE FACTORS AFFECTING READING, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE LITERACY IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES

Factors Predicting Collaborative Problem Solving: Based on the Data From PISA 2015

Student-centered teaching across OECD countries: An ecological perspective

Does ICT Use Matter? the Relationships Between Students' ICT Use, Motivation, and Science Achievement in East Asia

Provincializing the OECD-PISA global competences project

Eastern versus Western gaps in whole child education: how school climate works for academic achievement and well-being across China, Korea, Finland, and the United States

Investigating student collaborative problem-solving competency and science achievement with multilevel modeling: Findings from PISA 2015

Moral Panic, Miracle Cures and Educational Policy: what can we really learn from international comparison?