Abstract:In many countries, including the UK, the potential of international student achievement surveys such as TIMSS and PISA is being subverted by political and media fixation on the resulting league tables. These prompt not just well-founded efforts to learn from others’ success but also ill-founded assertions about educational cause and effect, inappropriate transplanting of the policies to which success is attributed, and even the reconfiguring of entire national curricula to respond less to national culture, values and needs than to the dubious claims of ‘international benchmarking’ and ‘world class’ educational standards – the latter equated with test scores in a limited spectrum of human learning. Informing such responses are the attractively simple nostrums of high profile and highly selective literature reviews that massage policymakers’ urge for the quick fix by playing down the complex interplay of culture and schooling and ignoring the kinds of evidence that can provide a truer and more nuanced picture of education systems in action. Using a typology developed by the US National Research Council, the paper critiques three recent and influential examples of this paradigm before illustrating an alternative approach. This draws on the author’s comparative studies of culture and pedagogy to show how explicating the principles that underpin observed classroom practice, rather than copying national policies, can lead to genuine transformation of the quality and outcomes of student learning. The paper ends by contending that PISA panic and the supremacist mindset it feeds have dangerously distorted the debate about what a ‘world class’ education should entail. With PISA 2012 now in progress, policymakers are urged to redress the balance.

The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate

Is Japanese education the “exception”?: examining the situated articulation of neo-liberalism through the analysis of policy keywords

School curriculum reform in contemporary Japan: competencies, subjects, and the ambiguities of PISA

Moral Panic, Miracle Cures and Educational Policy: what can we really learn from international comparison?

Redesigning What is National: The Politics of Education and the New Moral Education Initiative in Globalizing Japan

The influence of the Programme for International Student Assessment on educational governance situated in the institutional setting of South Korea

Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the OECD’s PISA for Schools

The New Japanese Educational Reforms and the Achievement “Crisis” Debate

Education reform and education politics in Japan

PISA and the criticism of Finnish education: justifications used in the national media debate

Challenges in fostering democratic participation in Japanese education

Constructing underachievement: the discursive life of Singapore in US federal education policy

Standardization, Deregulation, and School Administration Reform in Japan

The OECD as Pivot of the Emerging Global Educational Accountability Regime: How Accountable are the Accountants?

Datafication of schooling in Japan: an epistemic critique through the ‘problem of Japanese education’

Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field

Policy borrowing of the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR) in Japan: an analysis of the interplay between global education trends and national policymaking

A critical discourse analysis of ELT institutional contradictions in language policy and recruitment in Japan

Improving schooling through effective governance? The United States, Canada, South Korea, and Singapore in the struggle for PISA scores

The Moderating Effect of Gender Equality and Other Factors on PISA and Education Policy

Civic Education in Japan