Abstract:Background context: A few studies have already investigated the influences of functional structures of the cervical spine on its biomechanical behavior. In most studies, this has been done by measuring the range of motion. However, this parameter lacks of qualitative information about the overall kinematic behavior, such as coupled motions or translations. These data are essential for future development of cervical implants and surgical techniques. Purpose: An investigation of the influences of cervical structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine under in vivo conditions is almost impossible due to ethical reasons. Therefore, an in vitro study was conducted which allowed the analysis of these influences using three-dimensional helical axes. Study design/setting: An in vitro test applying pure moments on mono-segmental specimens was designed in order to investigate the influences of a series of structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine using three-dimensional helical axes. Methods: In this study we extracted motion segments C2-C3, C4-C5, and C6-C7 from 6 human cadaveric specimens with an average age of 48 years. The specimens were carefully selected using X-ray images. For the in vitro experiments, seven states were defined. The first state represented the intact state of each specimen. The remaining six states correspond with the subsequent resection of the following structures in the given order: interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, facet capsule, vertebral arch, posterior longitudinal ligament, and anterior longitudinal ligament. Each state was tested using a well-established spine tester. Each test sequence included 3.5 quasi-static motion cycles in all three bending directions using pure moments of 1 Nm. All motions were recorded using a motion tracking device and six reflective markers which were attached to the specimens. The recordings were then used to calculate the 3D helical axes, which were matched with the X-ray images. Due to the small number of specimens, qualitative results, such as the helical axes, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: In general, the overall range of motion was increased in all loading directions due to the resection steps. The least change in the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine was observed during flexion/extension. For lateral bending and axial rotation the greatest change in the pattern of the helical axes was observed during the resection of the vertebral arch. For some specimens, however, typical patterns regarding the orientation of the helical axes remained until the last state. For lateral bending, it could be observed that the deviation in the axes' orientation increased whereas for axial rotation it decreased. Conclusion: Resection of the cervical ligaments are much less crucial than the removal of guiding structures such as the facet joint. Furthermore, coupled motions not only result from the orientations of the articular surfaces of the facet joints but also from the overall shape of the cervical vertebrae including the uncinate processes. Clinical significance: It is well-known that coupled motions play a substantial role in cervical kinematics. However, the influences of cervical structures on the overall kinematic behavior of the cervical spine are not yet fully understood. Knowledge of these influences could help to reduce or even prevent iatrogenic degeneration after surgical intervention. Furthermore, the data provided by this study can be helpful for future developments of cervical implants as well as finite element models for more advanced numerical investigations.

Estimating Facet Joint Apposition with Specimen-Specific Computer Models of Subaxial Cervical Spine Kinematics

Development, calibration and validation of impact-specific cervical spine models: A novel approach using hybrid multibody and finite-element methods

Cervical facet capsular ligament mechanics: Estimations based on subject-specific anatomy and kinematics

[Establishment and Validation of Three Dimensional Finite Element Model of Lower Cervical Bilateral Facet Locking].

Identification of a lumped-parameter model of the intervertebral joint from experimental data

Musculoskeletal modelling of the human cervical spine for the investigation of injury mechanisms during axial impacts

Load-Sharing and Kinematics of the Human Cervical Spine Under Multi-Axial Transverse Shear Loading: Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation

Facet deflection and strain are dependent on axial compression and distraction in C5-C7 spinal segments under constrained flexion

Biomechanical analysis of C4-C6 spine segment considering anisotropy of annulus fibrosus.

Biomechanical Behavior of the Human C4-C6 Cervical Motion Segment under Axial Compression

Prediction of Cervical Spinal Joint Loading and Secondary Motion Using a Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Model Via Force-Dependent Kinematics Approach

Analysis of three-dimensional facet joint displacement during two passive upper cervical mobilizations

Biomechanical Analysis of Facet Joint Slippage of Lumbosacral Joints under Static Loadings

Investigation on the Biomechanical Behaviour of the Lower Cervical Spine Induced by Facet Tropism with Respect to the Sagittal Plane

Influences of functional structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine

INFLUENCE OF THE CONSTITUTIVE MATERIAL BEHAVIOR MODEL ASSIGNED TO THE ANNULUS FIBROSUS AND THE NUCLEUS PULPOSUS ON THE BIOMECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF A MODEL OF THE CERVICAL SPINE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS STUDY

Effects of facet joint degeneration on stress alterations in cervical spine C5-C6: A finite element analysis.

Inverse kinematics in cervical spine models: Effects of scaling and model degrees of freedom for extension and flexion movements

Simulative investigation of the required level of geometrical individualization of the lumbar spines to predict fractures

Development and validation of a geometrically personalized finite element model of the lower ligamentous cervical spine for clinical applications

Biomechanical analysis of cervical spine (C2–C7) at different flexed postures