Location of Adenomas Missed by Optical Colonoscopy
Perry J. Pickhardt,Pamela A. Nugent,Pauline A. Mysliwiec,J. Richard Choi,William R. Schindler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00009
IF: 39.2
2004-09-07
Annals of Internal Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Previous estimates of the adenoma miss rate with optical colonoscopy (OC) are hindered by the use of OC as its own reference standard.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and characteristics of colorectal neoplasms that are missed prospectively on OC by using virtual colonoscopy (VC) as a separate reference standard.DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter screening trial.SETTING: 3 medical centers.PARTICIPANTS: 1233 asymptomatic adults who underwent same-day VC and OC.MEASUREMENTS: Colorectal neoplasms (adenomatous polyps) missed at OC before VC results were unblinded.RESULTS: Fourteen (93.3%) of 15 nonrectal neoplasms were located on a fold; 10 (71.4%) of these were located on the backside of a fold. Five (83.3%) of 6 rectal lesions were located within 10 cm of the anal verge.LIMITATIONS: Estimation of the OC miss rate depended on polyp detection on both VC and second-look OC and therefore underestimates the true OC miss rate, particularly for smaller polyps.CONCLUSIONS: Most clinically significant adenomas missed prospectively on OC are located behind a fold or near the anal verge. The 12% OC miss rate for large adenomas (>or=10 mm) when state-of-the-art 3-dimensional VC is used as a separate reference standard is increased from the previous 0% to 6% estimates derived by using OC as its own reference standard.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?