Abstract:Background and objectives: Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Excision of premalignant polyps has a significant impact on reducing colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity. Colonoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis and affords an opportunity for treatment of colonic polyps. In recent years, serious debates have taken place because of the biological characteristics of diminutive polyps (DPs), polypectomy complications, and serious costs. There has not yet been a consensus on the management of DPs. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the real clinical importance of DPs smaller than 5 mm in diameter, which are frequently seen in geriatric patients by new endoscopic techniques, and to help in determining screening and surveillance programs. Methods: The patients who underwent colonoscopy and were found to have a diminutive colorectal polyp (<5 mm from September 1, 2016 through September 1, 2017), were classified into 3 groups according to the imaging method used: flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), narrow band imaging (NBI), or I-SCAN. In all groups, demographic data were compared according to Paris classification (morphologic) and Kudo classification (correlation between the prediction of endoscopic diagnosis and final pathological examination) in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values. Results: Two hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the study: 97 in the NBI group, 83 in the FICE group, and 87 in the I-SCAN group. There were no statistically significant differences between NBI, FICE, and I-SCAN in differentiating neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps, according to the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = .809). Conclusions: The estimated progression rates of DPs to advanced adenomas or colorectal cancer (CRC) are very low. Missing these polyps or not excising them may lead to failure to diagnose some cancers. There is a need for further comprehensive studies of removing all polyps to determine whether non-high-risk lesions require further pathologic examination and to re-examine routine surveillance programs.

Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy

Risk Factors for Incomplete Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy

Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy

Risk Factors Related to Polyp Miss Rate of Short-Term Repeated Colonoscopy

Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies

Factors associated with the efficacy of polyp detection during routine flexible sigmoidoscopy

Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies

Clinical significance of colorectal polyp detection on colonoscopy insertion

Pathological Analysis of Colonic Polyps and the Recurrence of Polyps after Polypectomy

Complete endoscopic removal rate of detected colorectal polyps in a real world out-patient practical setting

Detection rates of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopies and their associated factors in the SCREESCO study

Clinical Significance of Diminutive Colonic Polyps in Elderly Patients

Diminutive polyps among black and Latino populations undergoing screening colonoscopy: evidence supporting a resect and discard approach

Colonoscopy and polypectomy: beside age, size of polyps main factor for long-term risk of colorectal cancer in a screening population

Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy

Colorectal polypectomy during insertion and withdrawal or only during withdrawal? A randomized controlled trial

Colon Polyp Surveillance: Separating the Wheat From the Chaff

Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program

Risk factors for synchronous high-risk polyps in patients with colorectal cancer

S1640 The Prevalence of Large Colorectal Polyps Requiring EMR, ESD, EFTR, or Surgery Found During Screening Colonoscopy

Accuracy of Computer-aided Diagnosis in Colonoscopy Varies According to Polyp Location: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis