Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to theorize the activities of Korean civil society in international development cooperation by examining the resource mobilization and collective identity formation of the Korean Civil Society Forum on International Development Cooperation(KoFID) from a social movement theory perspective. Originality: While recent research on civil society in international development cooperation has focused on government-civil society relations, this study analyzes the activities of the KoFID in terms of a social movement theory perspective. Methodology: This study forms an analytical framework from resource mobilization theory and constructivism theory and analyzes the KoFID’s website and the materials of its general assembly for 13 years. Result: The potential for KoFID to undertake policy advocacy was well established in the environment surrounding civil society, government, and the international community since the mid-2000s. Civil society’s experience in policy advocacy provided human resources, financial resources, and expertise. The experience of networks and individual organizations in policy advocacy, as well as the government's policy orientation, increased the motivation of CSOs to engage in policy advocacy. Civil society was concerned about the government's perspective and attitude toward civil society as a recipient of ODA and as a complement to government policies. The collective identity of the need for civil society to play a role as a policy advocate was shared among the participating organizations. Based on this, the KoFID has been implemented collective actions as a policy advocate. Conclusion and Implication: The KoFID has been conducting policy monitoring and alternative proposal activities to the government with a collective identity as a policy advocate by mobilizing the resources of development NGOs and CSOs, inluding their organizations, people, and experience.

Theorizing Issue Selection in Advocacy Organizations: An Analysis of Human Rights Activism around Darfur and the Congo, 1998–2010

What They Are Fighting For – Introducing the UCDP Conflict Issues Dataset

Do Advocacy Coalitions Matter? Crisis and Change in Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy

Muting or Meddling? Advocacy as a Relational Communication Strategy Affecting Organization–Public Relationships and Stakeholder Response

The limits of oral history: ethics and methodology amid highly politicized research settings

Corporate Social Advocacy as Public Interest Communications: Exploring Perceptions of Corporate Involvement in Controversial Social-Political Issues

The Ties that Bind: A Network Analysis of Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations

News You Can Use or News That Moves?

How Corporate Social Advocacy Affects Attitude Change Toward Controversial Social Issues

Philanthropic Cause Prioritization

Heroism and ambiguity: Ngo advocacy in international policy

Responding to sexual violence: Women’s mobilization in war

Lessons from the Advocacy Coalition Framework for climate change policy and politics

Public discourse narratives: from 'Secret Aid Worker' discontent to shifting power in humanitarian systems

#Advocatingforchange: the Strategic Use of Hashtags in Social Media Advocacy

NGO Activism: Exposure vs. Influence

Policy Wars for Peace: Network Model of NGO Behavior

Dropping off the bandwagon: a puzzle for the resource mobilisation perspective on civil society contestation networks

The Organizational Selection of Status Characteristics: Status Evaluations in an Open Source Community

An Analysis of the Policy Advocacy of Korean Civil Society in International Development Cooperation: Focusing on Resource Mobilization and Constructivism Frame Theory

“Americans Have Taught Us: There Is A Difference Between Democracy and Creating Problems”