Dropping off the bandwagon: a puzzle for the resource mobilisation perspective on civil society contestation networks

Scott Michael Hamilton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2232825
IF: 4.366
2023-07-11
Journal of European Public Policy
Abstract:This paper builds on an implicit assumption of resource mobilisation theory in order to explain why civil society organisations stay on policy bandwagons. It demonstrates that, after the initial decision to engage with a policy issue, organisational maintenance explains ongoing contestation better than the structural factors which encourage them to get involved. It also adds three new findings which contribute to the existing literature on attention cascades: (1) at the actor level, the effect of salience on contestation is often short-lived; (2) organisational maintenance encourages factionalisation within groups of like-minded policy opponents; and (3) that survival strategies adapted to domestic political opportunity structures can limit CSOs' capacity to participate in European policy debates. The argument is tested using measures of network centrality from an online forum (Twitter) as a predictor for ongoing participation in campaigns against the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The findings are of immediate relevance to trade scholars seeking to understand the reactions of civil society organisations to contestation; interest group scholars focused on the determinants of issue prioritisation; and EU integration scholars seeking to explain variation in the domestication of EU policy issues.
public administration,political science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?