“Americans Have Taught Us: There Is A Difference Between Democracy and Creating Problems”

Dana El Kurd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095864.003.0003

2020-01-01

Abstract:What effect does international involvement have on individual preferences for democracy? In the case of the Palestinian Authority, this chapter argues that international involvement creates a principle-agent problem between political elites (agent) and the societies they purport to present (principal). When international patrons are involved, political elites are shielded from societal pressures, and orient their decision-making towards the patron rather than society. Coupled with financial and infrastructural assistance, this has the effect of entrenching the regime in an inherently undemocratic manner. The chapter utilizes a mixed-method approach to assess this question. First, the chapter presents interviews with political elites, working within the regime and thus directly targeted by many forms of international involvement. Elites are asked about democracy to assess how external involvement affects their preferences on this subject, given their proximity/relation to the governing apparatus. For the sake of comparison across the state–society line, this study also utilizes a nationally-representative survey with an experimental component. The chapter provides empirical evidence of how international involvement may affect domestic preferences conditionally, depending on where individuals place themselves in relation to the regime. The chapter also provides evidence of a divergence in preferences across the state–society line, as a result of international involvement.